Using problem structuring methods in strategic planning.

C Thunhurst; C Barker

doi:10.1093/heapol/14.2.127

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10538716

Using problem structuring methods in strategic planning.

C Thunhurst·C Barker

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we present approaches to problem structuring that have been employed to derive planning guidelines as part of a comprehensive strategic planning process. The approaches were developed for use in the context of a developing country, where quantitative data is particularly scarce. They rely heavily upon the informed judgement of technical planning officers. We discuss ways of ensuring that the approach remains flexible and participative.

Explore related subjects

Catchment Area, Health Developing Countries Feasibility Studies Female Health Planning Health Planning Guidelines Humans Male Pakistan Planning Techniques Population Growth Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C Thunhurst, C Barker. 1999. Using problem structuring methods in strategic planning.. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol%2F14.2.127

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

[Factors affecting drug expenditure in the primary care centre in a health area].

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors affecting drug expenditure.Design. Cross-sectional study.Setting. Madrid Primary Care area. PARTICIPANTS: 21 health centres. MEASUREMENTS: Association of the drug expenditure per inhabitant of each health centre during 1999 with the characteristics of its staff and operation of the centre. MAIN RESULTS: Expenditure on drugs per inhabitant, 14360 plus minus 3040 pesetas (86.31 plus minus 18.27; general practitioners, 19.62 plus minus 23.8%; doctors working as locums, 40.48 plus minus 20.72%; women doctors, 59.76 plus minus 13.36%; family doctors, 38.57 plus minus 21.35%; team nurses, 86.6 plus minus 18.27%; population over 65, 18.03 plus minus 7.73%; patients per day attended by each general practitioner, 32.82 plus minus 3.81; number of sessions per year on prescription profiles, 5 plus minus 3.91; prescription avoidable because of health card: 3106 plus minus 808 pesetas (18.67 plus minus 4.86 ); compliance with service offer, 1.7 plus minus 3.78. Drug expenditure per inhabitant dropped when sessions on prescription profiles (p = 0.013), the percentage of women doctors (p = 0.067) and the percentage of family doctors (p = 0.035) increased; and it dropped too when the over-65 population (p = 0.099) and the amount of prescription avoidable through the card (p = 0.034) dropped. In the multivariate analysis, the sessions on prescription profiles (ss = -843), the percentage of nurses in the reformed model (ss = -155), the percentage of family doctors (ss = -142) and the percentage of doctors from the traditional model (ss = -121) explain 71.2% of the variability in drug expenditure per inhabitant (F = 6.909; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The sessions to discuss prescription profiles, the presence of nurses from the reform model, postgraduate medical training and the employment of doctors under the traditional model are the factors that our study finds are linked to lower drug expenditure per inhabitant.

Catchment Area, Health↗

PubMed2002

Toward a population health delivery system: first steps in performance measurement.

In spite of the technological sophistication and clinical excellence of the U.S. health care industry and annual health expenditures in excess of a trillion dollars, the overall health status of the American population is comparatively poor. The BCHS in west central Florida sought to improve the health status of the communities that it serves. Known by the acronym CHAPIR, an information-driven health status decision support system was developed, pilot tested, and is now fully implemented throughout the BCHS. The methodological approach, quantitative indicators, report format components, and management implications of the system are described.

Catchment Area, Health↗

PubMed2001

Does Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) correlate with Under-Privileged Area 8 (UPA8) score and could it be a better 'Jarman Index'?

BACKGROUND: Widespread scepticism persists on the use of the Under-Privileged Area (UPA8) score of Jarman in distributing supplementary resources to so-attributed 'deprived' UK general practices. The search for better 'needs' markers continues. Having already shown that Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) is a predictor of UK GP workload, we compare, here, CTVB of residence of a random sample of patients with their respective 'Jarman' scores. METHODS: Correlation coefficient is calculated between (i) the CTVB of residence of a randomised sample of patients from an English general practice and (ii) the UPA8 scores of the relevant enumeration districts in which they live. RESULTS: There is a highly significant correlation between the two measures despite modest study size of 478 patients (85% response). CONCLUSIONS: The proposal that CTVB is a marker of deprivation and of clinical demand should be examined in more detail: it correlates with 'Jarman', which is already used in NHS resource allocation. But unlike 'Jarman', CTVB is simple, objective, and free of the problems of Census data. CTVB, being household-based, can be aggregated at will.

Catchment Area, Health↗