PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1054320

General comments on continuing education.

Abstract

Dental education should be a continuing process from undergraduate days throughout the dentists' practising life. The development of postgraduate courses has moved earlier the point at which a licence to practise is conferred, and in so doing has increased the responsibility to pursue continuing education and training after licensure. There is a growing tendency for attendance at continuing education courses to become a condition for relicensure in the hope that this will increase the status of the profession and improve the standard of dental care. So long as the requirement is for the attendance at courses this development deserves support. However any suggestion of re-examination should be resisted since this could only lead to increased stress on the competent dentist who was a poor examinee. A questionnaire sent to dental educators produced information on the proportion of dentists currently attending continuing education courses in ten countries and also enabled the popularity of different subjects to be assessed. It is suggested that courses should be arranged so that the whole field of dentistry is covered every five years. If the profession does not organize its own programme of continuing education and motivate its members to participate voluntarily in such courses, governments may well impose upon it requirements which could be less acceptable to the status and dignity of the profession.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Cowan. 1975. General comments on continuing education.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1054320/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effectiveness of dental postgraduate courses--are we doing the right thing?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of dental postgraduate one-day courses in radiation protection in Wales. DESIGN: Analysis of dentists' performance pre- and immediately post-course training. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-five general dental practitioners took part in eight courses. Identical, validated multiple choice questionnaires were completed anonymously at the start and at the end of each course. Fifty (+62.5%) or above was regarded as a satisfactory standard. Two hundred and fifty-three (89%) paired morning-afternoon records were completed and analysed. Data was compared to that of similar courses five years earlier. RESULTS: The mean (SD) pre- and post-course percentage scores were 33.8 (13.5) and 63.6 (14.6). The mean improvement was 29.8 percentage points (SD 11.7). The pre-post correlation was +0.66. At baseline only six (2.4%) of the 253 practitioners achieved the preset standard. After the course, 146 (57.7%) did so, an improvement of 55.3% (95% CI 48.9-61.3%). The final score and score gain were slightly higher in more recent graduates. The increase in proportion attaining the standard following training was 11.9% higher for IRMER than for POPUMET (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: The level of knowledge in radiation protection was very low at baseline. Whilst attending the approved course led to considerable improvement, it did not invariably result in a satisfactory level of knowledge in fundamental radiation physics and regulations. The prescribed standard was achieved by less than 60% of the attendees. The IRMER course was significantly more effective than its POPUMET predecessor.

Education, Dental, Continuing↗