PubMed · 10557708
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K Jungkind, C Corish. 1999. Pilot acute ischemic stroke program saves $9,756 per case.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10557708/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To compare methods and key management recommendations from recent stroke prevention guidelines. METHODS: Systematic review of guidelines for prevention of ischemic stroke published in English between 1996 and 2001 was conducted, and recommendations were independently abstracted and compared. RESULTS: Among 22 stroke prevention guidelines, information was provided about panel selection in 24%, funding source in 36%, consensus methods in 33%, and quantitative risk/benefit estimates in 38%. Eleven recommended anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, but eight different sets of criteria to identify high-risk patients were proposed. Recommendations regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis varied from general endorsement in a setting of low perioperative risk to routinely withholding surgery. All nine relevant guidelines endorsed aspirin in dosages between 50 and 325 mg/day for initial antiplatelet therapy following cerebral ischemia; six also suggested other antiplatelet agents as options for initial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Current stroke prevention guidelines do not provide adequate methodologic information to permit assessment of their quality, potential bias, and clinical applicability. Management recommendations are relatively consistent but differ in several important areas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Data are conflicting concerning risk for ischemic stroke associated with hyperhomocyst(e)inemia (hyper-Hcy) and a common polymorphism in the gene encoding 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR 677C-->T), which predisposes to hyper-Hcy in vivo. METHODS: Search of MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, and abstracts of conference proceedings revealed relevant articles. Exposure was defined as follows: 1) prevalence of hyper-Hcy; 2) absolute difference in the mean Hcy concentration between subjects with and without ischemic stroke; and 3) the MTHFR TT genotype frequency. Outcome was defined as ischemic stroke with or without neuroimaging. Inclusion criteria were retrospective and prospective studies with reported odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) or arithmetic mean Hcy levels. Exclusion criteria were absence of OR or HR, outcome defined as carotid atherosclerosis or intima-media thickening, stroke in patients younger than 18 years old, and studies in languages other than English. Statistical analyses for between-study heterogeneity and pooled risk estimates were performed using Stata software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Among 16 studies (1,487 stroke and 2,554 nonstroke cases), the pooled mean Hcy level in patients with ischemic stoke was 2.32 micromol/L (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.04; p < 0.001) greater than that in those without ischemic stroke. Among 14 included studies (1,769 stroke and 7,400 nonstroke cases), the pooled OR estimate of ischemic stroke associated with hyper-Hcy was 1.79 (95% CI, 1.61 to 2.0; p < 0.001). Among 19 included studies (2,788 stroke and 3,962 nonstroke cases), the OR associated with the TT genotype was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.58; p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: These data support an association between mild-to-moderate hyper-Hcy and ischemic stoke. The MTHFR TT genotype may have a small influence in determining susceptibility to ischemic stoke.