PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10557938

Pathways bring dramatic clinical results.

Abstract

Although physicians at Good Samaritan Health System in Kearney, NE, first offered stiff resistance to case managers' efforts to implement a clinical pathway program, efforts to educate the physicians about the benefits of pathways have led to a turn-around in which physicians now are asking the director of case management to create even more pathways. One key step in promoting the pathways was to create a reporting profile capable of evaluating clinical pathways. In addition, the hospital produced a video for each pathway that describes the patient's care from preadmission through discharge. Most significantly, case managers at Good Samaritan avoided creating an adversarial relationship with physicians in the system. They dodged charges of pathways being "cookbook medicine" by establishing a system in which pathways are not automatically applied; physicians have to write an order for a patient to be placed on a pathway.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1999. Pathways bring dramatic clinical results.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10557938/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impaired glucose tolerance: qualitative and quantitative study of general practitioners' knowledge and perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate general practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to impaired glucose tolerance. DESIGN: Mixed methodology qualitative and quantitative study with semistructured interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires. SETTING: 34 general practitioners in five primary care groups in the north east of England. RESULTS: All the general practitioners had knowledge of impaired glucose tolerance as a clinical entity, but they had little awareness of the clinical significance of impaired glucose tolerance and were uncertain about managing and following up these patients. Attitudes to screening were mixed and were associated with reservations about increased workload, concern about lack of resources, and pessimism about the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions. Some general practitioners felt strongly that screening patients for impaired glucose tolerance and subsequent lifestyle intervention medicalised an essentially social problem and that a health educational approach, involving schools and the media, should be adopted instead. A minority expressed a positive attitude towards a pharmacological approach. CONCLUSION: Awareness of impaired glucose tolerance needs to be raised, and guidelines for management are needed. General practitioners remain to be convinced that they have a role in attempting to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes by targeting interventions at patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗