PubMed · 10565431
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T Myers. 1999. Taking a dimmer view.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10565431/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The influence of high electric field strength on the separation of basic analytes in non-aqueous alcohol background electrolyte (BGE) solutions was investigated. Increasing the separation voltage in capillary electrophoresis (CE) may be advantageous if the conductivity of the BGE solution is low enough to allow fast separations without excessive Joule heating or band broadening. The voltage range tested was 20-60 kV with methanol and ethanol, and 25-60 kV with propanol and butanol as solvent for BGE. The resulting electric field strengths ranged from 660 V cm(-1) to 2000 V cm(-1). Experiments were made with a special laboratory constructed CE instrument. The separation efficiency vs. voltage curve was found to vary with the alcohol BGE solution. The increase in voltage decreased the separation efficiency in the case of methanol BGE solution, but with the other BGEs a clear efficiency maximum was obtained above 30 kV. The highest separation efficiencies were achieved with propanol BGE solution, where the efficiency maximum was reached at 45 kV. However, reasonable efficiency was achieved even at 60 kV. The extent of Joule heating was determined by calculating the temperature inside the capillary and the observed plate heights were interpreted in terms of the Van Deemter equation. The decrease in the separation efficiency with higher voltage was attributed mainly to Joule heating in the case of methanol and ethanol BGE solution and to the analyte adsorption on the capillary wall with propanol and butanol BGE solutions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When evaluating possible mechanisms by which low frequency electromagnetic fields may have a biological effect, arguments based on photon energy have often been used in a misleading way. For visible light the concept of photons has proved to be very useful in explaining experimental findings. However, the concept of photons cannot be used without major modifications in describing phenomena related to near field problems at power frequency (50 or 60 Hz) electric and magnetic fields. For this regime, the photon description is very complex. A very high number of highly coherent photons must be used in a quantum electrodynamic description of low frequency electromagnetic field phenomena. Thus, one-photon interaction descriptions must be replaced by multiple-photon interaction formalism. However, at low frequencies, a classical electromagnetic field description is far more useful than quantum electrodynamics. There is in principle no difference in how much energy an electron can pick up from a low frequency electric field as compared to from a high frequency photon. Thus, the total gain in energy is not limited to the energy carried by a single photon, which is E = hv, where h is Planck's constant and (v) is the frequency of the radiation. However, the time scale of the primary event in a mechanism of action is very different for ionizing radiation compared to power line frequency fields. The advice is to consider the time scale given by the inverse of the frequency of the fields, rather than photon energy, when one use physics as a guidance in evaluating possible mechanisms for biological effects from low frequency electromagnetic fields.