PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10572970

Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation.

L H Mens·G Huiskamp·T Oostendorp·P van den Broek
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Volume conduction models were used qualitatively to model surface potentials from cochlear implant patients recorded earlier by the authors. These recorded potentials reflected the equivalent dipole orientation in the head in patients who are deaf due to otosclerosis, but increased uniformly with the distance between the stimulating electrodes along the basilar membrane in other patients, which suggested a low and high resistivity of the cochlear bone, respectively. Several models of the head were constructed, with compartments representing the skin, skull, brain, cochlea, internal and external ear canal. In the "petrous bone" model, the cochlea was modelled as a cavity in a bony layer surrounded by the brain compartment. Of all models, the petrous bone model using a high resistivity ratio (1:100) between the bony and the other compartments was the only one that produced outcomes similar to the potentials observed in non-otosclerosis patients. In conclusion, the results suggested that the surface potentials observed in non-otosclerosis patients are sufficiently explained by a high impedance between cochlear turns and a non-specific return of current via the wall of the petrous bone into the larger brain compartment.

Explore related subjects

CochleaElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedEvoked PotentialsHumansModels, AnatomicJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L H Mens, G Huiskamp, T Oostendorp, P van den Broek. 1999. Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation.. https://doi.org/10.1080/010503999424680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing.

The cochlea uses active amplification to capture faint sounds. It has been proposed that the amplifier comprises a set of self-tuned critical oscillators: each hair cell contains a force-generating dynamical system that is maintained at the threshold of an oscillatory instability, or Hopf bifurcation. While the active response to a pure tone provides frequency selectivity, exquisite sensitivity, and wide dynamic range, its intrinsic nonlinearity causes tones of different frequency to interfere with one another in the cochlea. Here we determine the response to two tones, which provides a framework for understanding how the ear processes the more complex sounds of speech and music. Our calculations of two-tone suppression and the spectrum of distortion products generated by a critical oscillator accord with experimental observations of basilar membrane motion and the nervous response. We discuss how the response of a set of self-tuned oscillators, covering a range of characteristic frequencies, represents the structure of a complex sound. The frequency components of the stimulus can be inferred from the timing of neural spikes elicited by the vibrating hair cells. Passive prefiltering by the basilar membrane improves pitch discrimination by reducing interference between tones. Our analysis provides a general framework for examining the relation between the physical nature of the peripheral detection apparatus and psychophysical phenomena such as the sensation of dissonance and auditory illusions.

Cochlea↗
PubMed2001

Selective inner hair cell loss in premature infants and cochlea pathological patterns from neonatal intensive care unit autopsies.

BACKGROUND: Deafness and handicapping sensorineural hearing impairment occur frequently in neonatal intensive care unit survivors for unknown reasons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hearing was tested early and repeatedly in neonatal intensive care unit patients with an auditory brainstem response (ABR) screener. The temporal bones of 15 nonsurvivors (30 ears) were fixed promptly (average, 5 hours) after death for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Among these patients, 12 failed the ABR screen bilaterally, 1 passed unilaterally, and 2 passed bilaterally. Cochlear histopathologic conditions that could contribute to hearing loss included bilateral selective outer hair cell loss in 2 patients, bilateral selective inner hair cell loss in 3 (all premature), and a combination of both outer and inner hair cell loss in 2. Other hair cell abnormalities were noted; the 2 infants who had passed the ABR screen demonstrated normal histological features. Neuronal counts were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Auditory brainstem response failure among these neonatal intensive care unit infants who died was extremely common in part owing to an unexpected histological alteration, selective inner hair cell loss among premature newborns, that should be detectable uniquely by the ABR testing method. Additional histological patterns suggest more than one cause for neonatal intensive care unit hearing loss. Hair cell loss patterns seem frequently compatible with in utero damage.

Cochlea↗
PubMed2001

A genetic approach to understanding auditory function.

Little is known of the molecular basis of normal auditory function. In contrast to the visual or olfactory senses, in which reasonable amounts of sensory tissue can be gathered, the auditory system has proven difficult to access through biochemical routes, mainly because such small amounts of tissue are available for analysis. Key molecules, such as the transduction channel, may be present in only a few tens of copies per sensory hair cell, compounding the difficulty. Moreover, fundamental differences in the mechanism of stimulation and, most importantly, the speed of response of audition compared with other senses means that we have no well-understood models to provide good candidate molecules for investigation. For these reasons, a genetic approach is useful for identifying the key components of auditory transduction, as it makes no assumptions about the nature or expression level of molecules essential for hearing. We review here some of the major advances in our understanding of auditory function resulting from the recent rapid progress in identification of genes involved in deafness.

Cochlea↗