PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10574293

Event-related alpha oscillations in task processing.

V Kolev·J Yordanova·M Schürmann·E Baţar
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent findings substantiate the view that electroencephalographic (EEG) alpha rhythm (7-13 Hz) is functionally involved in information processing. However, the association of alpha rhythms with cognitive brain processes is less well understood because both augmentation and suppression of alpha oscillations have been observed to accompany task performance. The present study evaluates the effect of task processing on event-related alpha oscillations at the level of single-sweep analysis. METHODS: EEG was recorded from Fz, Cz and Pz electrodes in 10 subjects participating in two experimental sessions, in which auditory stimuli with equal physical parameters were presented under different instructions (passive and task). Separate measurements of single-sweep amplitude and phase-locking were performed and statistically analyzed for consecutive time windows in the poststimulus epoch. RESULTS: Major results show that, during the cognitive task, the phase-locking of alpha oscillations at the frontal site is significantly increased for the time window of 500-1000 ms after stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of enhanced and synchronized frontal alpha activity in higher brain processes is strongly emphasized.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAlpha RhythmCognitionCortical SynchronizationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMalePeriodicityPitch DiscriminationJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Kolev, J Yordanova, M Schürmann, E Baţar. 1999. Event-related alpha oscillations in task processing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00105-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

REM sleep enhancement due to rhythmical auditory stimulation in the rat.

From a physiological viewpoint, REM sleep (REMS) is a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are impaired. In the rat, REMS occurs in two forms respectively characterized by episodes separated by long intervals (single REMS episodes) and by episodes which have short intervals and occur in sequences (REMS clusters). Since the partition of REMS in the form of either single or clustered episodes may reveal how the REMS drive and body homeostatic processes interact in the control of REMS occurrence, we have used this approach to clarify the effects of the rhythmical delivery of an auditory stimulus (1000 Hz, 63 or 88 dB, 50 ms, every 20 s), which has been previously observed by different authors to enhance REMS in the absence of a previous sleep deprivation. Stimuli were delivered to pairs of animals and triggered by the occurrence of REMS in one rat (REMS-selective stimulation), whilst the other animal received the same stimulus irrespectively of the stage of the wake-sleep cycle (REMS-unselective stimulation). The results showed that the REMS-selective stimulation did not change the overall amount of REMS, since an increase in the occurrence of REMS clusters was concomitant with a decrease in the occurrence of single REMS episodes. In contrast, under the REMS-unselective stimulation, the total amount of REMS was increased during the second day of stimulation through an increase in the duration of both types of REMS episodes. Since during the REMS-unselective stimulation 87% of the stimuli fell outside REMS (i.e., during the REMS interval), the results show that the occurrence of REMS is more consistently affected when the stimuli are delivered in a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are fully operant.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response in two strains of mice.

It has been shown before that unconditioned footshocks can augment the acoustic startle response in rats. In the present study, male mice of two strains, C57Bl/6N and BALB/c, were compared with regard to footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response. Presentation of footshocks did not affect the acoustic startle response in C57Bl/6N mice, while in contrast, footshock-induced sensitization was apparent in the BALB/c strain. Shocked C57Bl/6N mice, but not BALB/c mice, displayed robust conditioning to the startle context when re-tested the next day. These findings indicate that mice may exhibit footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response, but that the effects of footshocks on the acoustic startle are strain- and time-dependent.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Optimal perception of surface roughness requires lateral movement between skin and surface, suggesting the importance of temporal cues. The roughness of periodic gratings is affected by changing either inter-element spacing (groove width, G) or element width (ridge width, R). Peripheral neural responses to gratings depend quantitatively on a spatial variable, G, and a temporal variable, grating temporal frequency (F(t)), with changes in R acting indirectly through concomitant changes in F(t). We investigated, psychophysically, the contribution of temporal cues to human tactile perception of roughness, using gratings varying in either R or G. Gratings were scanned across the immobile fingerpad with controlled movement speed (S) and contact force. In one experiment, we found that roughness magnitude estimates depended on both G and F(t). In a second experiment, discrimination of the roughness of gratings varying in either R or G was affected by manipulating F(t). Overall, the effect of G on roughness judgments was much stronger than that of F(t), probably explaining why many previous studies using surfaces that varied only in inter-element spacing led to the conclusion that temporal factors play no role in roughness perception. However, the perceived roughness of R-varying gratings was determined by F(t) and not spatial variables. Roughness judgments were influenced by G and F(t) in a manner entirely consistent with predicted afferent response rates. Thus perceived roughness, like peripheral afferent responses, depends in part on temporal variables.

Acoustic Stimulation↗