PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10584608

Preoperative screening.

Abstract

In screening the preoperative patient, several sources of risk, each with potentially modifiable components, must be considered. These include risks related to the proposed procedure, anesthetic, and medical illnesses present in the patient. To screen effectively, one must look for potential factors in each area that may affect perioperative morbidity and mortality. Once risk areas are identified, it is helpful to quantify them further through a focused testing approach, especially when the anticipated surgical or anesthetic risks are high. Data obtained through this process should guide the optimization of the patient's medical status to modify risks when possible. Sharing information obtained during the preoperative assessment with both anesthesiologists and surgeons helps to refine plans for management and may better ensure patient safety in the perioperative period.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Litaker. 1999. Preoperative screening.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70180-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Performance of health-status scales when used selectively or within multi-scale questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Little work has been done to investigate the suggestion that the use of selected scales from a multi-scale health-status questionnaire would compromise reliability and validity. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three scales selected from the SF-36 generic health questionnaire when administered in isolation or within the entire SF-36 to patients with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: Two groups of patients referred to an orthopedic department completed a mailed questionnaire within 4 weeks prior to and a second questionnaire during their visit. The first group completed three SF-36 scales related to physical health (physical functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions) on one occasion and all eight SF-36 scales on the other occasion. The second group completed the entire SF-36 on two occasions. Results for patients who reported unchanged health status and had complete scores were analyzed; 80 patients in the first and 62 patients in the second group. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha reliability and intraclass correlation coefficients exceeded 0.7 for all three scales for both groups. For the first group the mean difference between the scores was 0.4 point for physical functioning, 2.5 points for bodily pain, and 0.5 point for general health perceptions, which did not differ significantly from the corresponding differences for the second group (0.1, 1.9 and 1 point, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of selected scales from a multi-scale health-status questionnaire seems to yield similar results compared to their use within the entire questionnaire.

Health Status↗