PubMed · 10596297
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Schröter, K Mohr. 1999-11-05. [Does budesonide affect growth?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10596297/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The efficacy of FRONTLINE SPRAY (0.25% (w/v) fipronil), FRONTLINE SPOT-ON FOR DOGS (10% (w/v) fipronil) and FRONTLINE PLUS FOR DOGS (10% (w/v) fipronil and 9% (S)-methoprene) against the biting louse Trichodectes canis on dogs was confirmed under laboratory conditions. A field study evaluated the efficacy of a single topical application of FRONTLINE SPRAY and FRONTLINE SPOT-ON against the parasite on dogs. A total of 48 dogs of mixed breeds, both sexes, aged 2 months-7 years and weighing 1.8-37.0kg were used. The animals were either experimentally (laboratory study) or naturally (field study) infested with lice. Dogs were housed individually in order to prevent contact between animals. In the laboratory study, animals were allocated based on pre-treatment louse counts from 38 hair coat-partings per animal. Dogs were randomly assigned to the four treatment groups: (1) untreated control; (2) FRONTLINE SPRAY, at 6ml/kg; (3) FRONTLINE SPOT-ON as per label and (4) FRONTLINE PLUS as per label. Dogs in treatment groups 2-4 were treated twice topically on Days 0 and 28. The number of live lice in the 38 hair coat-partings per animal were counted on Days 2, 7 and weekly to Day 63. In addition, a whole body comb count was performed on Day 63. No live T. canis were found on dogs treated with FRONTLINE formulations at any post-treatment examination. The difference from controls was significant (P<0.01) for each product at each examination. Based on the whole body comb count at Day 63, the efficacy of each product was determined to be 100%. In the field study, dogs were allocated in strict order of presentation. Dogs were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups: (1) BOLFO collar (propoxur); (2) FRONTLINE SPRAY, at 6ml/kg and (3) FRONTLINE SPOT-ON as per label. Dogs were treated once topically on Day 0. The number of live lice was determined by whole body searches on Days 0 (pre-treatment), 2, 28 and 42. Louse counts of dogs treated with either FRONTLINE SPRAY, or FRONTLINE SPOT-ON were not different than those of dogs receiving the propoxur collar. The efficacy was determined to be >98% on Day 2 and, 100% on Days 28 and 42 in all treatment groups. The results of these studies demonstrate that fipronil in topical formulations is effective for treatment and control of biting lice (T. canis) infestations on dogs.
This article presents the preparation and topical performance of some new lipid-based formulations of diclofenac, namely (a) a diclofenac aqueous gel containing mixed micelles (sodium cholate:egg lecithin molar ratio 0.55); (b) diclofenac lotion that contains soya lecithin, ethanol and buffer; and (c) diclofenac lipogel containing egg lecithin, isopropyl myristate, propylene glycol and ethanol. Gel formulations were prepared using Carbomer 934. Release of diclofenac from all formulations was monitored via dialysis through Spectra/por membrane into phosphate buffer (0.2 M pH=7.4) using a Franz cell. Drug release profile and diffusion coefficients were compared with brand formulation (Geigy's Vlotaren Emulgel). Statistical analysis of data show that the diffusion coefficient of the drug from these formulations rank according to the following order: Diclofenac lotion (D=5.308x10(-7) cm(2)/s) >lipogel (D=2.102 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s) >Voltaren Emulgel (1.518 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s) >aqueous gel mixed micelle (0.966 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s). These results show that diclofenac lotion and lipogel maybe more suitable formulations than the conventional topical dosage form.
Resistance to anthelmintics in nematode parasite of the digestive tract is a major concern in small ruminants and particularly in goats. One possible solution to limit the development and spread of resistance is to give treatments on a selective basis, i.e. by targeting the most susceptible animals within a flock rather than treating all the animals. In dairy goats, epidemiological studies have shown that, within a flock, goats in first lactation and the multiparous ones with the highest level of milk production were highly receptive to parasite infection. The objective of the study was to assess whether selective treatments could achieve a level of control of nematodes similar to systematic drenching. A similar experimental design was applied for two successive years. An experimental flock of 120 dairy goats was divided into two groups. All the goats from group SYS (systematic treatment) were drenched at mid-grazing season (July). In contrast, anthelmintics in group SEL (selective treatment) were restricted to the goats in first lactation plus the high producers. Overall, these treated goats represented 48% of the flock in year 1 and 66% in year 2. After treatments, both groups grazed on separate pastures. Parasitological and pathophysiological measurements were performed monthly. The results indicate a similar level of egg excretion in the two groups. The pathophysiological parameters (pepsinogen and phosphate concentrations) were also similar in the two groups, as well as the milk production for the 2 years. These results suggest that a targeted use of anthelmintics may allow efficient control of gastrointestinal nematodes whilst resulting in a predicted reduction in the selection pressure for the development of anthelmintic resistance.