PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10596397

Sterilization and its consequences.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this review is to analyze critically the two techniques of sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation [BTL] and vasectomy) so that a physician may provide informed consent about methods of sterilization. A MEDLINE search and extensive review of published literature dating back to 1966 was undertaken to compare preoperative counseling, operative procedures, postoperative complications, procedure-related costs, psychosocial consequences, and feasibility of reversal between BTL and a vasectomy. Compared with a vasectomy, BTL is 20 times more likely to have major complications, 10 to 37 times more likely to fail, and cost three times as much. Moreover, the procedure-related mortality, although rare, is 12 times higher with sterilization of the woman than of the man. Despite these advantages, 300,000 more BTLs were done in 1987 than vasectomies. In 1987, there were 976,000 sterilizations (65 percent BTLs and 35 percent vasectomies) with an overall cost of $1.8 billion. Over $260 million could have been saved if equal numbers of vasectomies and BTLs had been performed, or more than $800 million if 80 percent had been vasectomies, as was the case in 1971. The safest, most efficacious, and least expensive method of sterilization is vasectomy. For these reasons, physicians should recommend vasectomy when providing counseling on sterilization, despite the popularity of BTL. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to predict the failure rates and likelihood of successful reversal of tubal ligation and vasectomy; to recall the difference in cost between the two sterilization procedures, and to describe the short-term and long-term complications associated with each of the two methods of sterilization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N W Hendrix, S P Chauhan, J C Morrison. 1999. Sterilization and its consequences.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A technique for presenting risk and outcome data to potential living renal transplant donors.

BACKGROUND: Transplant centers have become increasingly interested in living donor kidney transplantation and have always had the obligation to counsel these donors fairly. Counseling techniques vary markedly among centers and can include overly qualitative or unintentional but covertly prescriptive presentation of risk and benefit. METHODS: We describe a simple technique using preprinted fields of stick figures for presenting important risk and benefit data to potential renal donors. We also suggest an approach to formulating basic statistics for donor counseling. RESULTS: Risk and benefit statistics can be presented visually and quantitatively in a way that minimizes the need for donor sophistication and also displays the "all or nothing" nature of adverse events in donor and recipient populations, as opposed to using of percentages or prescriptive phrases by the donor counselor. CONCLUSION: Such stick figure field counseling for living renal transplant donors accurately provides information to both donor and center, appropriately facilitates center impartiality, and may increase the center's and the donor's confidence in the counseling process.

Counseling↗