PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10598158

[Smoke poisoning].

Abstract

SYSTEMIC AND LOCAL EFFECT: Smoke inhalation causes systemic and local, mainly respiratory, toxicity due to the asphyxiant and irritant properties of toxic gases. OXYGEN DEPRIVATION AND INTOXICATION: The syndrome of oxygen deprivation and intoxication by asphyxiant gases is caused by combustion-induced oxygen deprivation and exposure to carbon monoxide (CO) and cyanide (CN), but also to other toxic gases. A loss of consciousness is a good sign of systemic toxicity; however, the respective role of CO, CN and other toxic gases cannot be determined. The presence of apnea, lactic acidosis, and severe cardiovascular disturbances is consistent with CN poisoning. A correlation exists between blood CO concentration determined on a sample obtained at the site of the fire, and the occurrence and severity of the clinical disorders. IRRITANT GASES INTOXICATION: This syndrome explains the mucosal injury affecting the eyes and the lungs. These complications are better diagnosed by clinical examination rather than by various investigations such as chest X-ray or fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Dysphonia is always a sign of severe poisoning. CLINICAL COURSE: In non-burned victims, delayed neurological and respiratory complications can be observed. Oxygen administration is the cornerstone supportive therapy. Hyperbaric oxygen should be discussed according to the severity of the syndrome of oxygen deprivation and intoxication by asphyxiant gases. In case of cyanide poisoning, a safe and effective antidote should be given; hydroxocobalamine seems to be the drug of choice. Supportive treatment is efficient to treat respiratory failure. Endotracheal intubation should be considered in patients exhibiting early dysphonia associated with dyspnea.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Hantson, L Benaissa, F Baud. 1999-11-13. [Smoke poisoning].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10598158/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of pulmonary intra-alveolar hemorrhage in cases of sudden infant death due to SIDS in a safe sleep environment or to suffocation.

The differentiation of SIDS from accidental or inflicted suffocation may be impossible without corroborating findings from the death scene or autopsy or in the absence of a confession from a perpetrator. Pulmonary intra-alveolar hemorrhage (PH) has been proposed as a potential clue to suffocation, but none of the previous studies on this topic have limited SIDS cases to those who were in a safe sleep environment, in which all were found supine and alone on a firm surface with their heads uncovered. Our aims are to: (1) compare PH in SIDS cases found in a safe sleep environment to a control group comprised of infants whose deaths were attributed to accidental or inflicted suffocation and (2) assess the effect of age, CPR, and postmortem interval (PMI), with regard to the severity of PH in this subset of safe-sleeping SIDS cases. We conducted a retrospective study of all postneonatal cases accessioned by the Office of the Medical Examiner in San Diego County, California who died of SIDS or suffocation between 1999 and 2004. A total of 74 cases of sudden infant death caused by SIDS (34 cases as defined above, comprising 8% of the total SIDS cases), accidental suffocation (37), and inflicted suffocation (3) from the San Diego SIDS/SUDC Research Project database were compared using a semiquantitative measure of pulmonary intra-alveolar hemorrhage. The most severe (grade 3 or 4) PH occurred in 35% of deaths attributed to suffocation, but in only 9% of the SIDS cases. Age, duration of CPR attempts and PMI had no effect on the severity of PH in SIDS. Our results indicate that the severity of PH cannot be used independently to differentiate SIDS from suffocation deaths. Each case must be evaluated on its own merits after thorough review of the medical history, circumstances of death, and postmortem findings.

Asphyxia↗

Postmortem determination of concentrations of stress hormones in various body fluids--is there a dependency between adrenaline/noradrenaline quotient, cause of death and agony time?

To find out whether a certain cause of death or a certain length of an agonal period shows specific adrenaline or noradrenaline profiles, heart blood, femoral vein blood, liquor, urine and vitreous humour were taken from corpses (n = 98) at the Medical School Hannover, and noradrenaline and adrenaline were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Corpses were classified according to the following five categories: short agony, long agony, state after hanging, state after asphyxiation and state after CPR with documented administration of epinephrine. Once results were collected the adrenaline/noradrenaline quotient was determined. It became clear that there were no significant differences regarding the concentration of adrenaline and noradrenaline in the various body fluids in relation to the above-mentioned categories. The means adrenaline/noradrenaline quotients in femoral vein blood were 0.21 +/- 0.29 for hanged persons, 0.38 +/- 0.47 for asphyxiated persons, 0.17 +/- 0.19 for those with short agony and 0.42 +/- 0.43 for those with long agony, significantly below 1 (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; p = 0.003). For condition after CPR we found an adrenaline/noradrenaline quotient of 2.81 +/- 5.8. In liquor the adrenaline/noradrenaline quotients for short agony was 0.17 +/- 0.17, for hanged persons 0.18 +/- 0.19 and for asphyxiated ones 0.30 +/- 0.38, significantly lower than 1 (p < 0.001). In urine the adrenaline/noradrenaline quotients for all categories are lower than 1 (p < 0.001); short agony (0.13 +/- 0.09), long agony (0.21 +/- 0.16), hanged (0.15 +/- 0.16), asphyxiated (0.14 +/- 0.08) and CPR (0.14 +/- 0.06). In vitreous humour the quotients for short agony (0.14 +/- 0.28), long agony (0.13 +/- 0.12), hanged (0.07 +/- 0.09) and asphyxiated (0.09 +/- 0.11) are lower than 1 (p < 0.001). The spread of data for the adrenaline/noradrenaline quotient did not allow for any conclusions about cause of death and length of agony in individual cases.

Asphyxia↗