PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10613373

Fax technology for collecting outcomes data in a computer database.

Abstract

In this era of cost containment, outcomes research is becoming more prevalent. Therefore, various technologies allowing for flexibility in study design and the capture of specific clinical information need to be examined and used. These technologies include fax data systems, pocket scanners, automated telephone equipment, and hand-held computer devices. Fax data systems convert a fax machine into an automated data-entry system. Data-filled forms are faxed to a computer, the fax is converted, and the data are entered into preset fields in a database. Applications for fax systems include acute care-based and ambulatory care-based drug-use evaluations, drug recall systems, and patient-completed surveys of health status. Pocket scanners are hand-held instruments for rapid data entry and transport. Applications for pocket scanning include patient interview responses, procedure and disease analysis, and procedure coding. Options for automated telephone equipment include surveys with interactive voice-mail responses or keypad data entry, pharmacist-monitored drug information and survey services, fax-back and mail-out services, and patient-generated disease intervention programs. Hand-held computer technology is a source of information on multiple protocols and care pathways. All these technologies improve data collection with respect to accuracy and speed, facilitate data analysis, and promote cost-efficient information sharing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of fax technology in data collection for a prospective, multicenter study of the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of two drugs used in the treatment of cancer. Details for the pharmacoeconomic study can be found elsewhere. Fax technology was selected because of the ease with which those responsible for managing the data collection could be trained to use it, the affordability and efficiency of the technology, the ease with which data could be analyzed, and the accuracy of data collection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z M Khan, K L Rascati, J M Koeller, J Smeeding. 1999-12-15. Fax technology for collecting outcomes data in a computer database.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp%2F56.24.2540

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

HEE-GER: a systematic review of German economic evaluations of health care published 1990-2004.

BACKGROUND: Studies published in non-English languages are systematically missing in systematic reviews of growth and quality of economic evaluations of health care. The aims of this study were: to characterize German evaluations, published in English or German-language, in terms of various key parameters; to investigate methods to derive quality-of-life weights in cost-utility studies; and to examine changes in study characteristics over the years. METHODS: We conducted a country-specific systematic review of the German and English-language literature of German economic evaluations (assessment of or application to the German health care system) published 1990-2004. Generic and specialized health economic databases were searched. Two independent reviewers verified fulfillment of inclusion criteria and extracted study characteristics. RESULTS: The fulltexts of 730 articles were reviewed of which 283 fulfilled all entry criteria. 32% of included studies were published in German-language. 51% of studies evaluated pharmaceuticals and 63% were cost-effectiveness analyses. Economic appraisals concentrate on few disease categories and important health areas are strongly underrepresented. Declaration of sponsorship was associated with article language (49% English articles vs. 29% German articles, p < 0.001). The methodology used to obtain quality-of-life weights in published cost-utility studies was very diverse, poorly reported and most studies did not use German patients' or community health state evaluations. CONCLUSION: Many of the German-language evaluations included in our study are likely to be missing in international reviews and may be systematically different from English-language reviews from Germany. Lack of transparency and adherence to recommended reporting practices constitute a serious problem in German economic evaluations.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Optimal nonpoint source pollution control strategies for a reservoir watershed in Taiwan.

The purpose of this study is to develop a model for optimal nonpoint source pollution control for the Fei-Tsui Reservoir watershed in Northern Taiwan. Several structural best management practices (BMPs) are selected to treat stormwater runoff. The complete model consists of two interacting components: an optimization model based on discrete differential dynamic programming (DDDP) and a zero-dimensional reservoir water quality model. A predefined procedure is used to locate suitable sites for construction of various selected BMPs in the watershed. In the optimization model, the objective function is to find the best combination of BMP type and placement, which minimizes the total construction and operation, maintenance, and repair (OMR) costs of the BMPs. The constraints are the water quality standards for total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations in the reservoir. A zero-dimensional reservoir water quality model of the Vollenweider type is embedded in the optimization framework to simulate pollutant concentrations in Fei-Tsui Reservoir. The resulting optimal cost and benefit of water quality improvement are depicted by the model-derived trade-off curves. The modeling framework developed in the present study could be used as an efficient tool for planning a watershed-wide implementation of BMPs for mitigating stormwater pollution impact on the receiving water bodies.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Use of modeling to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening programs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is an analytic tool that provides a framework for comparing the health benefits and resource expenditures associated with competing medical and public health interventions, thereby allowing decision makers to identify interventions that yield the greatest amount of health, given their resource constraints. Models are important components of most, if not all, CEAs, and they play a key role in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening programs, in particular. In this article, we describe the basic types of models used to evaluate cancer screening programs and provide examples of the use of models in CEAs and to guide cancer screening policy. Finally, we offer some suggestions for important concepts to consider when interpreting model results.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗