PubMed · 10633699
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Pearson. Tissue donation.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.13.45.14.s27
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The question of whether two disorders cluster together, or coaggregate, within families often arises. This paper considers how to analyze familial aggregation of two disorders and presents two multivariate logistic regression methods that model both disorder outcomes simultaneously. The first, a proband predictive model, predicts a relative's outcomes (the presence or absence of each of the two disorders) by using the proband's disorder status. The second, a family predictive model derived from the quadratic exponential model, predicts a family member's outcomes by using all of the remaining family members' disorder statuses. The models are more realistic, flexible, and powerful than univariate models. Methods for estimation and testing account for the correlation of outcomes among family members and can be implemented by using commercial software.
Family studies have suggested that eating disorders and mood disorders may coaggregate within families. Previous studies, however, have been limited by use of univariate modeling techniques and failure to account for the correlation of observations within families. To provide a more efficient analysis and to illustrate multivariate logistic regression models for familial aggregation of two disorders, the authors analyzed pooled data from two previously published family studies (conducted in Massachusetts in 1984-1986 and 1986-1987) by using multivariate proband predictive and family predictive models. Both models demonstrated a significant familial aggregation of mood disorders and familial coaggregation of eating and mood disorders. The magnitude of the coaggregation between eating and mood disorders was similar to that of the aggregation of mood disorders. Similar results were obtained with alternative models, including a traditional univariate proband predictive model. In comparison with the univariate model, the multivariate models provided greater flexibility, improved precision, and wider generality for interpreting aggregation effects.