PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10633996

The PowerChecker: a visual basic program for ensuring data integrity.

Abstract

Data entry and encoding errors can jeopardize the integrity of data sets generated in a variety of research settings. Despite researchers' pursuits of more accurate entry methods, data entry errors persist. Although techniques exist for identifying such errors, the PowerChecker program described here provides a more efficient method of data set validation. Rather than enter data twice and then manually search for the correct values when there are discrepancies between the two sets, with PowerChecker the user can correct entry errors as the data are entered the second time. In addition, the time-stamped record of changes to the original data set aids in meeting quality assurance requirements of the Good Clinical Practice standards.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Beaty. 1999. The PowerChecker: a visual basic program for ensuring data integrity.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200757

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of non-linear non-parametric models for epilepsy data.

EEG spike and wave (SW) activity has been described through a non-parametric stochastic model estimated by the Nadaraya-Watson (NW) method. In this paper the performance of the NW, the local linear polynomial regression and support vector machines (SVM) methods were compared. The noise-free realizations obtained by the NW and SVM methods reproduced SW better than as reported in previous works. The tuning parameters had to be estimated manually. Adding dynamical noise, only the NW method was capable of generating SW similar to training data. The standard deviation of the dynamical noise was estimated by means of the correlation dimension.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

Testing whether treatment is 'better' than control with ordered categorical data: an evaluation of new methodology.

A new test procedure is presented for the problem of testing whether a treatment is better than a control when there is ordered categorical data. The new test is based on the methodology developed for general 'one-sided' alternatives by Cohen and Sackrowitz. An evaluation of the test is made by comparing the power and expected p-values of the test with those of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in examples. As predicted by the theoretical work by Cohen and Sackrowitz, the new test is seen to be preferable to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Computer programs to assist implementation of the new test are made available.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗