PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10647521

Primary bone tumor.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W C Peh. 2000. Primary bone tumor.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10647521/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tests for equivalence or non-inferiority for paired binary data.

Assessment of therapeutic equivalence or non-inferiority between two medical diagnostic procedures often involves comparisons of the response rates between paired binary endpoints. The commonly used and accepted approach to assessing equivalence is by comparing the asymptotic confidence interval on the difference of two response rates with some clinical meaningful equivalence limits. This paper investigates two asymptotic test statistics, a Wald-type (sample-based) test statistic and a restricted maximum likelihood estimation (RMLE-based) test statistic, to assess equivalence or non-inferiority based on paired binary endpoints. The sample size and power functions of the two tests are derived. The actual type I error and power of the two tests are computed by enumerating the exact probabilities in the rejection region. The results show that the RMLE-based test controls type I error better than the sample-based test. To establish an equivalence between two treatments with a symmetric equivalence limit of 0.15, a minimal sample size of 120 is needed. The RMLE-based test without the continuity correction performs well at the boundary point 0. A numerical example illustrates the proposed procedures.

Biopsy↗

Cervical biopsy/cytology correlation data can be collected prospectively and shared clinically.

Cervical cytology (Cy) and biopsy (Bx) correlation is used by institutions for the evaluation of their cytodiagnostic capabilities as a part of overall laboratory quality improvement (QI). However, the data obtained from correlation are not routinely included in most surgical pathology (SP) reports. Our laboratory's procedure is to include the correlation of the patient's previous (most recent) cytology smear in the surgical pathology report of all/any gynecologic surgical pathology specimens. We reviewed this process for the time period between July 1998-June 1999. Any noncorrelating cases were assigned a correlation review code by the reviewing cytopathologist: major Cy diagnostic error (DE1), minor Cy diagnostic error (DE2), Cy sampling error (Cy SE), or biopsy sampling error (Bx SE). Of 3,486 cases reviewed, 3,229 cases were satisfactory for correlation studies. Concordant results were found in 86.9%. Cy DE1 due to either Cy screening or interpretation errors or both were found in 0.2% (n = 7) of all cases, while Cy DE2 due to the same were found in 1% (n = 32). Bx SE accounted for discrepancies in 6.8% (n = 220) of all cases, while 5.1% (n = 164) of the total cases were discrepancies due to Cy SE. Follow-up Bx was available in 97.2% (n = 214) of the Bx SE, and showed 16.4% (n = 35) to be major discrepancies and 83.6% (n = 179) to be minor discrepancies. Cervical Cy/Bx correlation is useful for the evaluation of a laboratory's QI. It is also useful for the identification of either Cy or Bx SE. While QI data exist as "internal use only" documents, SE data (as part of the CC (correlation comment) included in SP reports) are vital to a specific/given patient. Bx SE was identified in 6.3% of our patients, indicating a possible need for rebiopsy. This type of QI data may be shared clinically, and may direct the management for maximum diagnostic and patient benefit.

Biopsy↗

MR-guided bone biopsy: preliminary report of a new guiding method.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a new MR compatible optical tracking guided bone biopsy system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wireless optical tracker elements were connected to a bone biopsy set. Biopsies of five different anatomic areas and lesions varying from 9 mm to 40 mm (mean 25 mm) in size, were performed. RESULTS: We were able to perform the biopsies in all cases, and the samples allowed for a pathologic diagnosis. The procedure time was limited to less than 40 minutes, and no complications occurred. CONCLUSION: MR-guided bone biopsy with this new guiding system was a feasible and fast procedure that did not compromise the usability of the bone biopsy set.

Biopsy↗