PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10650502

Bedside laparoscopy.

C G Rehm
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The improved technical sophistication of laparoscopy offers an attractive highly accurate diagnostic modality at the bedside for critically ill patients who are confined to the ICU and intensive monitoring unit and who are in need of timely abdominal evaluation. If the surgeon understands the physiologic effects of peritoneal insufflation and considers them during the procedure, the patient tolerates the procedure well. It is important to limit insufflation pressures and laparoscopy time. The author also recommends using the open Hasson technique. Its primary use is diagnostic in penetrating and blunt trauma and in the obscure abdomen. It has been successfully employed therapeutically for acalculous cholecystitis, abscess drainage, and correction of placement of gastrostomy tubes and peritoneal dialysis catheters. It helps avoid risky transport trips and negative or nontherapeutic laparotomy with its known associated risks.

Explore related subjects

Abdominal InjuriesCritical IllnessHumansLaparoscopyPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPoint-of-Care SystemsPressureRisk FactorsSepsisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C G Rehm. 2000. Bedside laparoscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70099-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in children by an endoscopically placed stent.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the pancreas from blunt abdominal trauma in children are rare. Most are minor and are best treated conservatively. The mainstay for treatment of major ductal injuries has been prompt surgical resection. Diagnostic imaging modalities are the key to the accurate classification of these injuries and planning appropriate treatment. Computed tomography (CT) scan has been the major imaging modality in blunt abdominal trauma for children, but has shortcomings in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal injury. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been shown recently to be superior in diagnostic accuracy. The therapeutic placement of stents in the trauma setting has not been described in children. METHODS: Two children sustained major ductal injuries from blunt abdominal trauma that were suspected, but not conclusively noted, on initial CT scan. Both underwent ERCP within hours of injury. In case 1, a stent was threaded through the disruption into the distal duct. In case 2, a similar injury, the stent could only be placed through the ampulla, thereby reducing ductal pressure. In both cases, clinical improvement was rapid with complete resolution of clinical and chemical pancreatitis, resumption of a normal diet, and discharge from the hospital. The stents were removed at 10 and 12 days postinjury, and both children have remained well. Follow-up ERCP and CT scans show complete healing of the ducts and no evidence of pseudocyst formation 1 year post injury. CONCLUSIONS: Acute ERCP should be the imaging modality of choice in suspected major pancreatic ductal injury. Successful treatment by placement of an intrapancreatic ductal stent may be possible at the same time. Surgical resection or reconstruction can then be reserved for cases in which stenting is impossible or fails.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2001

Operative management of abdominal injuries in children.

Operative repair of visceral injuries in children is infrequent enough so that an individual surgeon's experience may decay as time goes by. This report recommends incisions, a plan for thorough exploration, and the best surgical strategies for abdominal injuries, Simplicity and organ conservation are emphasized.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2001

Blunt abdominal trauma: screening us in 2,693 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of screening abdominal ultrasonography (US) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with blunt abdominal trauma underwent US. The abdomen and pelvis were scanned for free fluid, the visceral organs were assessed for heterogeneity, and duplex US was performed if necessary. Empty bladders were filled with 200-300 mL of sterile saline through a Foley catheter. US findings were considered positive if free fluid was present or if parenchymal abnormalities that could be consistent with trauma were detected. Screening US results were compared with findings of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, repeat US, computed tomography (CT), cystography, surgery, and/or autopsy and/or the clinical course. RESULTS: Findings from 2,693 US examinations were evaluated and were positive in 145 of 172 patients with injuries (sensitivity, 84%) and 64 (89%) of 72 patients who ultimately underwent laparotomy with surgical repair of injuries. False-negative findings were retroperitoneal injury, bowel injury, and intraperitoneal solid organ injury without hemoperitoneum. No patient with false-negative findings died. Specificity of US was 96% (2,429 of 2,521 patients), and overall accuracy was 96% (2,574 of 2,693 patients). Positive predictive value was 61% (145 of 237 patients), and negative predictive value was 99% (2,429 of 2,456 patients). CONCLUSION: Abdominal US is useful in screening for injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, and its use represents a notable change in institutional practice. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is rarely performed, and CT is used when screening US findings are positive, when injury is clinically suspected despite negative US findings, or when US is not available.

Abdominal Injuries↗