PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10658793

Minimum standards in laboratories for infection control.

Abstract

Laboratory services should be available to support every infection control programme, whether in a hospital or community setting. The services will depend upon available resources and the expectation of the clinicians using the services. Equally, resources reflect the level of staff expertise, equipment and finances supporting laboratory practice. All information given to the clinical staff should be sensible, accurate, comprehensible and in keeping with the clinical needs of the healthcare setting. Internal and external quality controls should be rigorous. Not all laboratories are expected to provide an all-encompassing service and therefore primary, secondary and tertiary or referral laboratories should be established where necessary. It is essential to have clear protocols on laboratory usage, mutually agreed between the laboratory and clinical staff to be cost effective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Mehtar. 1999. Minimum standards in laboratories for infection control.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90100-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes.

A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities.

Guidelines as Topic↗

International guidance on the establishment of quality assurance programmes for radioactivity measurement in nuclear medicine.

A new guidance document for the implementation of quality assurance (QA) programmes for nuclear medicine radioactivity measurement, produced by the International Atomic Energy Agency, is described. The proposed programme is based on the principles of ISO 17025 and will enable laboratories, particularly in developing countries, to provide consistent, safe and effective radioactivity measurement services to the nuclear medicine community.

Guidelines as Topic↗

A cautionary tale.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Guidelines as Topic↗