PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10664758

Demonstrating the temporal modulation transfer function.

Abstract

A 120-frame movie, which can be downloaded from specified web sites, allows an observer to see the qualitative form of his or her temporal modulation transfer function. Results collected from two of the authors are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Anstis, L Kontsevich, C Tyler. 1999. Demonstrating the temporal modulation transfer function.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2766

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms.

Determining the direction of visual motion poses a serious problem for any visual system, given the inherent ambiguities. Geisler (1999) has suggested that motion streaks left in the wake of a moving target provide a rich source of potential information that could aid in resolving direction ambiguities. Here we provide strong experimental evidence that the human visual system does in fact exploit motion streaks in direction discrimination. Masks comprising oriented random noise impeded direction discrimination of moving dots when the masks were oriented parallel to the direction of motion but had very little effect when oriented orthogonal to the direction of motion. The masking effect decreased systematically with increasing bandwidth for the parallel masks and increased with bandwidth for the orthogonal masks. Importantly, these masks had little effect on neither contrast sensitivity for detecting the moving stimuli nor for speed discrimination. Experiments with "Glass patterns" (moiré patterns constructed from random dot pairs) confirmed that misleading pattern information can impede motion detection. The results show that the oriented streaks left by moving stimuli provide fundamental information about the direction of visual motion; removing these streaks or augmenting them with erroneous streaks severely confounds motion direction discrimination.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

We used textures of randomly moving grating patches to assess the role of fine-grain temporal synchrony in texture segregation. In the target area, patches reversed direction simultaneously. In the surround, patches changed direction at random times. Thus, phase changes in the target area were precisely synchronous, whereas those in the surround were not. In agreement with work carried out by Lee and Blake, we found that the target area was frequently visible, and that observers could discriminate its shape (horizontal versus vertical) at frame rates of 100 Hz in brief exposures (200 ms). Further experiments suggested that the length of unidirectional motion sequences in the target area, rather than synchrony, determined its visibility. To eliminate completely contrast and motion cues, we made all the background elements identical to the target elements, but with a random starting phase. Despite the presence of synchrony in the target area but not the background, the target was generally very hard to see. Targets that remained visible contained low temporal frequency modulations of direction. We conclude that the human observer can detect synchrony, but only at modest temporal frequencies once motion and contrast artefacts have been eliminated.

Contrast Sensitivity↗