PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10665362

Electrical burns.

E A Luce
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Electrical burns can be divided into flash or typical thermal injury and high-tension injury. The latter is usually caused by greater than 1000 volts and produces a clinically characteristic entry and exit wound. The optimal management of patients with high-tension electrical injury has evolved into a plan of urgent exploration and debridement, aggressive redebridement, and early wound closure.

Explore related subjects

Burns, ElectricCataractCraniocerebral TraumaFemaleHumansMalePerineumPlastic Surgery ProceduresJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E A Luce. 2000. Electrical burns.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10665362/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Experience of 14 years of emergency reconstruction of electrical injuries.

Although there have been great advances in the treatment of electrical injuries in the last 20 years, the extremity loss ratio in electrical injuries remains at an unacceptably high level. The primary cause is due to the progressive tissue necrosis which results in the continuous extension of necrosis in the wound, leading to loss of the whole injured extremity. This study reports attempts to break the dangerous tissue necrosis circle and save the form and function of damaged extremities. After 14 years of systematic experimental and clinical studies a successful comprehensive urgent reconstruction alternative (CURA) for electrical injuries is proposed. CURA includes: debriding the wound as early as possible after injury; preserving the vital tissue structures as much as possible, such as nerves, vessels, joints, tendons, bone, even though they have undergone devitalization or local necrosis; repairing these vital tissues during the first surgery if functional reconstruction requires it; protecting the wound bed by covering with tissue flaps of rich blood supply; improving flap survival through moist dressings supported by continuous irrigation beneath the flaps for a 24-72h period after surgery with measures to control local infection; and last, giving general systemic treatment with vasoactive agents and antibiotics. Four hundred and fifty nine wounds in 155 patients suffering from electrical injuries have been successfully treated with this technique between 1986 and 2000 and are reported in this paper. Satisfactory results were obtained with the extremity loss proportion reduced to less than 9% compared with 41.5% during the 10 years before 1984 in the same hospital. The authors suggest that CURA is an effective and workable method for treatment of electrical injuries.

Burns, Electric↗
PubMed2002

Estimation of current density distribution under electrodes for external defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic defibrillation is the most common life-saving technique for the restoration of the heart rhythm of cardiac arrest victims. The procedure requires adequate application of large electrodes on the patient chest, to ensure low-resistance electrical contact. The current density distribution under the electrodes is non-uniform, leading to muscle contraction and pain, or risks of burning. The recent introduction of automatic external defibrillators and even wearable defibrillators, presents new demanding requirements for the structure of electrodes. METHOD AND RESULTS: Using the pseudo-elliptic differential equation of Laplace type with appropriate boundary conditions and applying finite element method modeling, electrodes of various shapes and structure were studied. The non-uniformity of the current density distribution was shown to be moderately improved by adding a low resistivity layer between the metal and tissue and by a ring around the electrode perimeter. The inclusion of openings in long-term wearable electrodes additionally disturbs the current density profile. However, a number of small-size perforations may result in acceptable current density distribution. CONCLUSION: The current density distribution non-uniformity of circular electrodes is about 30% less than that of square-shaped electrodes. The use of an interface layer of intermediate resistivity, comparable to that of the underlying tissues, and a high-resistivity perimeter ring, can further improve the distribution. The inclusion of skin aeration openings disturbs the current paths, but an appropriate selection of number and size provides a reasonable compromise.

Burns, Electric↗