PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1067028

Hepatic granulomata: problems in interpretation.

Abstract

Granulomata occur in the liver not only in patients with systemic granulomatous disease, but also in a variable number with underlying liver disease and in a heterogeneous group of disorders that appear to be neither hepatic nor granulomatous in nature. The hepatic granulomata found in association with liver disease are rarely attributable to complicating systemic granulomatous disease, and probably represent a nonspecific response to the underlying hepatic disease. In the heterogeneous group of diseases that appear to be neither hepatic nor granulomatous in nature, hepatic granulomata may (in some instances) represent a nonspecific response to such conditions as intraabdominal malignancy and ulcerative bowel disease. However, in others, particularly those with unexplained prolonged fever, hepatic granulomata may be attributable to specific agents that are overlooked or escape detection by currently available diagnostic measures. The etiology of hepatic granulomata can seldom be established on histological grounds alone, and usually requires collateral clinical and laboratory evidence for identification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Klatskin. 1976. Hepatic granulomata: problems in interpretation.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb47054.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗