PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10675645

Detecting coherent and incoherent frequency modulation.

Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether or not the auditory system contains a neural mechanism that is sensitive to differences in the pattern of frequency modulation imposed on widely separated carriers. Experiment 1 measured the discrimination between an unmodulated two-tone complex and one in which either coherent or incoherent frequency modulation was imposed on the two carrier frequencies. These two frequencies were either 1100+1925 Hz or 1100+2000 Hz, and the stimuli were presented against a pink-noise background. The method was based on that used in experiments by Furukawa and Moore (1996), which were previously interpreted as providing evidence in favour of a mechanism sensitive to FM coherence. Discrimination was sometimes better for coherent than for incoherent FM, as reported by Furukawa and Moore, but only for four out of the eight listeners tested. The remaining experiments excluded those subjects who had shown no effect of FM coherence in experiment 1. Experiment 2 showed that detection of a static shift on the carrier frequencies of the two components was better when the carriers were shifted in the same, compared to the opposite, direction. This difference occurred regardless of whether the carriers were modulated coherently, incoherently, or were unmodulated. The experiment also showed that performance was better when the 1100-Hz carrier was shifted down and the 1925-Hz carrier was shifted up, compared to when the 1100-Hz carrier shifted up and the 1925-Hz carrier shifted down. Experiment 3 showed that this difference also applied to dynamic changes: detection of quasi-linear frequency sweeps (0.5 cycles of sinusoidal FM) was better when the higher component glided up and the lower component glided down than vice versa. In the former condition, performance was as good as with same-direction sweeps. It is concluded that the effects observed in experiment 1 and by Furukawa and Moore result from the processing of a global percept arising from the perceptual fusion of the two carriers, and do not represent an across-frequency mechanism sensitive to FM coherence. In addition, it is argued that experiments 2 and 3 demonstrate the existence of perceptual asymmetries in hearing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R P Carlyon. 2000. Detecting coherent and incoherent frequency modulation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00200-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗