PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10693412

Interpreters: a double-edged sword in nursing practice.

H J Maltby
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The provision of health services for all Australians is based on equality of access to health care services, regardless of cultural origin or linguistic skill, and on the responsibility of the health system to respond appropriately. Lack of fluency in the English language and lack of bilingual or multilingual nurses are major sources of miscommunication, even with the use of interpreters and translated health information. Many immigrant women find the use of interpreters unacceptable. Nurses are concerned with legal issues. These two viewpoints make the use of interpreters a double-edged sword in practice. The findings of recent research and the literature in relation to language skills and the use of interpreters and translations in the Australian context are explored. Potential resolutions for transcultural nursing practice are provided.

Explore related subjects

Communication BarriersHumansMultilingualismNurse-Patient RelationsPatient Education as TopicTranscultural NursingTranslatingJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H J Maltby. 1999. Interpreters: a double-edged sword in nursing practice.. https://doi.org/10.1177/104365969901000316

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

[Implementation of a new prescription system. A qualitative survey of organizational barriers].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify organisational difficulties faced by physicians and nurses when using drug prescribing sheets for the recording of both drug prescriptions and drug administration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Qualitative interviews with seven physicians and eight nurses from two general internal medicine wards. Main outcome measures were the difficulties explicitly identified during the interviews. RESULTS: The implementation of procedures conflicted with existing structure, culture, and routines. Insufficient competence within the system to use the drug prescribing sheets created resistance and made people create their own solutions to the problems they faced. A total of nine difficulties were identified: 1) insufficient knowledge and uncertainty about procedures, 2) ignorance of sources of error, 3) unclear responsibilities, 4) low community spirit, 5) insufficient communication, 6) clinician autonomy and low acceptance of change, 7) strong professional identity, 8) low priority task, and 9) logistic problems. DISCUSSION: Unawareness of procedures, insufficient dissemination of knowledge, and insufficient cooperation and skepticism among those who put drug handling into practice is likely to have an impact on the quality of health care. The identification of these obstacles may help managers to improve the quality of the drug handling process and make it possible to select a framework for changing the clinical behavior of doctors and nurses.

Communication Barriers↗