PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10693840

Collaborative care: a new model for a new century.

Abstract

From the imagined vantage point of the year 2020, the author recounts the problems and deficiencies of health care in the 1990s and describes how academic medicine's leaders successfully confronted them. A key part of their strategy was to work together to form a coordinated network of medical schools, teaching hospitals, and academically oriented health systems, along with their staffs and a variety of community-based partners. In this way, they set a national agenda, pursued common goals, freely shared information and best practices, and cooperated to optimize their effectiveness in education, research, and clinical care. A major outcome of this new network was the Collaborative Care model of health care, based on the premise that a basic purpose of the health care system is to achieve measurable improvements in the health of individuals and communities in ways that are cost-conscious, quality-driven, evidence-based, and patient-, family-, and community-oriented. Academic institutions formed strong partnerships with many stakeholders (e.g., purchasers of health care services) to make the Collaborative Care approach work. In addition, there were several other important keys to Collaborative Care's success, such as the full integration of clinical research with clinical care and the restoration of trust in the health care enterprise. The author returns to reality and the 1990s. He challenges academic medicine to pursue the Collaborative Care vision, saying that "we should not accept without challenge what we know to be abominable just because it appears to be inevitable.... Our choice is to continue to struggle for survival as the environment around us gets harsher and harsher ... or to fix the environment" using the power of collaboration to unleash academic medicine's unlimited creativity and wisdom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Cohen. 2000. Collaborative care: a new model for a new century.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200002000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Occupational health provision in UK universities.

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have been done of occupational health provision across an entire employment sector and universities are particularly understudied. The British government published updated guidance on university occupational health in 2006. AIM: To describe the occupational health services to all the universities in the UK. METHODS: All 117 universities in the UK were included. Detailed surveys were carried out in 2002, 2003 and 2004 requesting self-completed information from each university occupational health service. This paper presents information on general characteristics of the service, staffing, services provided and outcome reporting. RESULTS: There was variation in the type of occupational health provision; half the universities had an in-house occupational health service, 32% used a contractor, 9% relied on the campus primary care or student health service and 9% had ad hoc or no arrangements. In all, 93 of the 117 (79%) universities responded to the detailed questionnaire, the response rate being higher from in-house services and from larger universities. There was a wide variation in staffing levels but the average service was small, staffed by one full-time nurse with one half-day of doctor time per week and a part-time clerical or administrative member of staff. A range of services was provided but, again, there was wide variation between universities. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear if the occupational health provision to universities is proportional to their needs. The wide variation suggests that some universities may have less adequate services than others.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Ethnic segregation in Kosovo's post-war health care system.

BACKGROUND: Seven years after the end of war in Kosovo, Final Status Negotiations have begun to determine the long-term political future of the province. This article provides an overview of the present situation regarding ethnic groups and their relations in Kosovo's health care system that might be helpful in preparing for the array of potential ramifications and repercussions that could arise at the conclusion of the negotiations. METHODS: A review of the literature (including grey) was performed, and 16 interviews and two focus groups with key informants were conducted in Kosovo during October and November 2004. In addition, six informal discussions were held in-person or by telephone in London. Information collected in 2004 was re-confirmed and partially updated in October and November 2005, when three additional interviews were conducted in Kosovo. RESULTS: Ongoing ethnic tensions in Kosovo, mainly between the Albanian and Serb populations, perpetuate a rigidly segregated health care system. Some other minority communities, such as the Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians, are afflicted by the double burden of getting caught up in the middle of these ethnic disputes and at the same time suffering from poverty and discrimination. CONCLUSION: While efforts have been put forward to promote peace-building within Kosovo's post-war health sector, very little progress has been achieved in fostering ethnic integration, reconciliation, cooperation or even co-existence. This failure reflects Kosovo's broader unresolved inter-ethnic problems. Final Status Negotiations are one of the last opportunities for the international community to address the problems of ethnic segregation in the province.

Delivery of Health Care↗