PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10707373

Quality through metrics.

Abstract

The Quality Assurance Unit analyzed 18 months of departmental data regarding the report-audit cycle. Process mapping was utilized to identify milestones in the cycle for measurement. Five milestones were identified in the audit cycle, as follows: (1) time from report receipt in quality assurance to start of audit, (2) total calendar days to audit a report, (3) actual person-hours to perform a report audit, (4) time from completion of audit to issuance of report, and (5) total time a report is in quality assurance. An interrelationship diagraph is a quality tool that is used to identify what activities impact the overall report-auditing process. Once the data collection procedure is defined, a spreadsheet is constructed that captures the data. The resulting information is presented in time charts and bar graphs to visually aid in interpretation and analysis. Using these quality tools and statistical analyses, the Quality Assurance Unit identified areas needing improvement and confirmed or dispelled previous assumptions regarding the report-auditing process. By mapping, measuring, analyzing, and displaying the data, the overall process was examined critically. This resulted in the identification of areas needing improvement and a greater understanding of the report-audit cycle. A further benefit from our increased knowledge was the ability to explain our findings objectively to our client groups. This sharing of information gave impetus to our clients to examine their report-generation process and to make improvements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Frederick, T Kallal, H Krook. 1999. Quality through metrics.. https://doi.org/10.1080/105294100277697

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗