PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10720357

Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To implement and assess a rules based computerised prescribing system with the aim of improving the safety of prescriptions and the administration of drugs. DESIGN: Analysis of performance of computerised system plus questionnaire survey of users. SETTING: 64 bed renal unit in a teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: : Introduction of the system into routine clinical use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of attempted prescriptions cancelled by the system; proportion of warning messages overridden; users' comparisons of the system with conventional procedures. RESULTS: Between October 1998 and August 1999 the system cancelled 58 (0.07%) out of 87 789 prescriptions on the grounds of clinical safety. In addition, 427 (57%) attempted prescriptions generating high level warnings and 1257 (8%) generating low level warnings were not completed. In a user survey 82% (31/38) of doctors and nurses considered the system to be an improvement on conventional procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The system has contributed to safety and patient care. All prescriptions are complete and legible, and transcription errors have been eliminated. The system assists clinicians when they are writing a prescription by making available information on patients. The system supports clinical decision making and has been well received by doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P G Nightingale, D Adu, N T Richards, M Peters. 2000-03-18. Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.750

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.

Many computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems have integrated drug safety alerts. The authors reviewed the literature on physician response to drug safety alerts and interpreted the results using Reason's framework of accident causation. In total, 17 papers met the inclusion criteria. Drug safety alerts are overridden by clinicians in 49% to 96% of cases. Alert overriding may often be justified and adverse drug events due to overridden alerts are not always preventable. A distinction between appropriate and useful alerts should be made. The alerting system may contain error-producing conditions like low specificity, low sensitivity, unclear information content, unnecessary workflow disruptions, and unsafe and inefficient handling. These may result in active failures of the physician, like ignoring alerts, misinterpretation, and incorrect handling. Efforts to improve patient safety by increasing correct handling of drug safety alerts should focus on the error-producing conditions in software and organization. Studies on cognitive processes playing a role in overriding drug safety alerts are lacking.

Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted↗