PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10723818

Practical experiences in smoking reduction and cessation.

Abstract

Tobacco use is a major cause of cardiovascular, respiratory and oncological disease. Quitting smoking significantly benefits health, but for highly dependent smokers, unable to overcome their nicotine dependence, the concept of smoking reduction as a method of harm reduction is gaining ground. The University Hospital of Basle, Switzerland, has run double-blind, placebo-controlled smoking cessation and smoking reduction studies: the CEASE trial evaluated the efficacy of the nicotine patch in achieving abstinence, and the Rosette study is evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of the nicotine oral inhaler in smokers who do not wish to quit. Smokers were instructed either to quit smoking (CEASE) or to reduce cigarette consumption by > 50% (Rosette). In both studies, success rates for active treatment versus placebo at 4 months demonstrated that nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is effective in achieving both smoking cessation and reduction. Current approaches to smoking cessation and reduction at our clinic are discussed. Combination NRT rather than monotherapy is commonly used to achieve both smoking reduction and cessation. Treatment appears to be most effective if subjects are allowed to select their preferred NRT product. There are clear differences in patient populations aiming to quit or reduce, the cessation population being more motivated. Smoking cessation remains the ultimate aim but, if unfeasible, a significant reduction in cigarette consumption is a valid goal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C T Bolliger. 2000. Practical experiences in smoking reduction and cessation.. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652140032035

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Redefining response in overactive bladder syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three potential definitions of treatment response in overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, based on the International Continence Society (ICS) definition of OAB, using pooled data from two large clinical trials of the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin succinate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As the ICS definition of OAB does not rely on urodynamic observations for a diagnosis, the use of composite endpoints, such as in the definitions examined here, might provide a more relevant measure of patient benefits. Each definition was tested to assess the impact of pharmacotherapy, comparing treatment response rates based on composite endpoints. Responder definitions were validated based on the impact on quality of life (QoL). Pooled data from two 12-week multinational, multicentre, double-blind randomized studies of solifenacin, a once-daily oral antimuscarinic for treating OAB symptoms, were used for this analysis. Based on the symptom data from these studies (episodes of urgency, incontinence, nocturia and voiding frequency per 24 h), response was defined as being: (i) a reduction by half or more in all baseline symptoms; (ii) a reduction by half or more in urgency and at least one other symptom; or (iii) resolution of urgency episodes and at least one other symptom. Health-related QoL changes were recorded using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ). RESULTS: Solifenacin at 5 mg or 10 mg once daily resulted in significantly higher response rates than with placebo, irrespective of the definition of a responder (P < or = 0.001). When assessing the most challenging definition of response (resolution of urgency and at least one other symptom), solifenacin at 5 mg and 10 mg resulted in 20% and 25% of patients, respectively, meeting the response criteria, vs 12% of placebo-treated patients (P < or = 0.001 for both solifenacin doses). For all three definitions of response, responders showed greater improvements in all KHQ domains than did nonresponders, and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The two strictest definitions of response (halving or more in all baseline symptoms or resolution of urgency and more than one other symptom) appeared to capture QoL changes most effectively. Establishing the most appropriate definition to assess treatment-related changes in OAB will require further investigation, but it is clear from this analysis that composite clinical endpoints, based on the ICS definition of OAB, are a valid approach for assessing the effect of treatments for OAB.

Double-Blind Method↗