PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10725016

Computerised patient record with distributed objects.

Abstract

The vast spectrum of information and functionality requirements imposed on a Computerised Patient Record (CPR), fueled by an ever changing and expanding business model demands information system interoperability. The management of information, created across the continuum of care, and associated information system functionality, can not be provided by data interchange to and from monolithic applications. WebDoctor is a Computerised Patient Record (CPR) which is fully used at the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana, Slovenia--a hospital with 500 beds and more than 200 users, all of them medical professionals. The data are stored in an underlying Oracle hospital data base. For logging the username and password security is used. WebDoctor uses Internationalization APIs. Currently GUI is currently written in Slovenian language, but can be easily adapted to any other language. It is available in either Metal or Windows look. Search for patients is based on CPR No. or partial data from demographics. All the available patients data can be found on a single screen divided into several tab sections. The tab sections cover general and speciality data. The general data include demographics, admissions and diagnoses, meanwhile the speciality data are divided into Labs where data are represented numerically by date or by type and graphically with the ability of detailed view in separate window, Radiology where results are represented in textual form as well as pictures together with a special viewer to provide detailed analyses and Radioisotopes where results are also being represented in textual form together with a graphical representation. WebDoctor is running on virtually any platform. It achieved the 100% Java Certification which places the application among the firsts if not the first of this kind in the healthcare industry. It excels with a small and light client which doesn't exceed the 150K.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Gornik, A Orel, D Roblek, R Verhovsek. 1999. Computerised patient record with distributed objects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10725016/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Place of death and its predictors for local patients registered at a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: To help with planning of a palliative care program, we reviewed the place of death of patients who were registered at our comprehensive cancer center and explored factors that predicted death in the hospital versus death at home. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of local patients who were registered at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and died during the 1997/1998 fiscal year. Data from the institutional tumor registry and from the State of Texas Bureau of Vital Statistics file were collected and analyzed. The main outcome measures were place of death, patient characteristics associated with place of death, and time from registration at the institution to death. RESULTS: Of 1,793 local patients, 251 (14%) died at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; the remaining 86% died elsewhere. A total of 617 (34%) died at home, and 929 (52%) died in an acute hospital setting (including M.D. Anderson). A total of 1,040 (58%) died within 2 years of registration. The risk of hospital death versus home death increased for patients with cancer at a hematologic site (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 6.8) and black ethnicity (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.6) and decreased for patients who paid with Medicare (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.90). CONCLUSION: Most patients died in an acute care hospital setting and within 2 years of registration. Our data show some predictors of hospital death for cancer patients and suggest that better hospital palliative care services and integrated palliative care systems that bridge community and acute hospitals are needed.

Cancer Care Facilities↗

Do not attempt resuscitation decisions in a cancer centre: addressing difficult ethical and communication issues.

Talking to patients about 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' decisions is difficult for many doctors. Communication about 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' decisions should occur as part of a wider discussion of treatment goals at an earlier stage in the patient's illness. A doctor should not initiate any treatment, including cardio-pulmonary resuscitation if he/she does not believe it will benefit the patient. An ethical framework is offered which may be of practical help in clarifying decision-making.

Cancer Care Facilities↗