PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10736982

Biphasic waveforms for automatic external defibrillation in human: a review.

Abstract

Ventricular fibrillation is the principal cause of sudden cardiac arrest and the electrical defibrillation is often the only effective therapy. A very interesting question is represented by the electric parameters of defibrillation shock. Today, monophasic waveform is widely used in Europe and in the United States, but, recently, the Food and Drug Administration grants approval for an automatic external defibrillator (AED) producing a biphasic pulse. In this review we discuss about the effectiveness and the safety of biphasic waveform, by examining a series of human studies between 1982 and 1999. We have found that available data are often incomplete, unclear, dishomogeneous and, consequently, difficult to compare. Furthermore, among the authors there is no concordance about the meaning of "safety", "effectiveness", "success", "equivalence" and "superiority" of biphasic versus monophasic shock: however, biphasic shock, that uses a lower energy level, seems to reduce post-defibrillation heart damage. Due to the lack of homogeneous studies it is not possible to state which kind of signal is more reliable, even if some clinical reports and experimental data seem to tribute to the biphasic waveform a better therapeutic effectiveness and safety. By examining the current scientific literature, we conclude that further studies have to be performed to definitively validate the use of biphasic shock.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Di Massa, M Scardigli, L Bruni, L Valentino. Biphasic waveforms for automatic external defibrillation in human: a review.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10736982/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A biventricular ICD system with biventricular defibrillation.

We describe the case of a 59-year-old gentleman with severe dilated cardiomyopathy requiring implantation of a dual-chamber biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). High defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were encountered at implant with an inadequate defibrillation safety margin. Testing of all possible shock vectors/polarities with and without the SVC coil and optimization of the distal RV coil position all proved inadequate. A satisfactory defibrillation safety margin was achieved following placement of a second lead in the coronary sinus to enable biventricular defibrillation. This case highlights an additional strategy for combating high DFTs and is an option even in dual-chamber biventricular ICD systems.

Electric Countershock↗