PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10748998

Needlestick-prevention devices.

Abstract

In the Introduction to our October 1999 Evaluation of needlestick-prevention devices (NPDs), we discussed how changes in the U.S. regulatory landscape were beginning to compel many healthcare facilities to switch from conventional needle-using devices to protective alternatives, such as NPDs. Our discussion focused on recent legislation introduced at the state and federal levels. Less than a month after we published that article, the pace of change increased dramatically. Most notably, two U.S. agencies--the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)--issued recommendations stressing the importance of using NPDs, and several additional states began considering NPD legislation. In this Update, we discuss the changes that have occurred since our October 1999 article. Also in this Update, we describe recent changes to our NPD ratings rationale and provide revised ratings for three previously evaluated NPDs. We discovered the need for these changes while compiling information for our new Special Report, the Health Devices Needlestick-Prevention Device Selection Guide. (This Special Report, which incorporates information from our three most recent NPD studies, is described on page 80.) We believe that, with these changes, our ratings more clearly convey the technical merits of each product.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Needlestick-prevention devices.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10748998/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Changing chairs: anticipating problems in prescribing wheelchairs.

PURPOSE: This article presents a framework for prescribing, ordering, and adapting a new wheelchair, focusing on individual, environmental and wheelchair factors that must be taken into consideration to ensure optimal function. METHOD: A review and analysis was conducted of all factors relevant to the transition to a new wheelchair. Without appropriate planning and implementation, this transition can result in unnecessary expenses, duplication of effort, and possibly even injury to the user and abandonment of the wheelchair. RESULTS: Recommendations are provided to manufacturers, therapists, technicians, users, insurers and physicians, who must work together throughout this process. To the extent feasible, the authors suggest that major changes from the previous wheelchair should be avoided, particularly for people with substantial functional limitations. Therapists and technicians must measure the user accurately, and anticipate those factors that can impede a smooth transition. Insurers and other payors must recognize that changing wheelchairs will often require substantial professional assistance, including several fittings to adjust the new chair to the needs of the user. CONCLUSION: Additional research and case reporting on outcomes of adjusting to a new wheelchair appear warranted.

Equipment Design↗

Current status of mechanical computed tomography in cardiac imaging.

Mechanical computed tomography (CT) scanners have undergone significant improvements in their ability to perform cardiac imaging. Previously limited by cardiac motion artifacts and slow acquisition speeds, newer-generation scanners are able to obtain multiple slices with a temporal resolution of <100 msec, minimizing motion artifacts to levels comparable to electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT). This is done using various approaches, including (1) prospective and retrospective electrocardiographic gating, (2) multislice detectors, and (3) partial and segmented reconstruction algorithms. The major CT manufacturers are putting significant resources into protocol optimization and cardiac applications development, including coronary calcium quantification, functional analysis, and coronary CT angiography. Given the rapid pace of development, higher in-plane and z-axis spatial resolution, and superior signal-to-noise ratio of mechanical scanners, it is evident that they will be capable of performing cardiac imaging with a quality approaching or possibly surpassing that of existing EBCT scanners. This article summarizes the current status of mechanical CT scanners in cardiac imaging.

Equipment Design↗