PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10750226

A competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and development.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of the general practitioner (GP) has changed significantly over the past decade. This problem is compounded by growing concern over postgraduate attrition rates from medicine, with current estimates as high as 19%. AIM: To define a comprehensive model of the competencies required for the job role of GP. METHOD: Three independent studies were conducted to define GP competencies including (1) critical incidents focus groups with GPs, (2) behavioural coding of GP-patient consultations, and (3) critical incidents interviews with patients. Study 1 was conducted with GPs (n = 35) from the Trent region. Study 2 involved observation of GP-patient consultations (n = 33 consultations), and Study 3 was conducted with patients (n = 21), all from a Midlands-based medical practice. RESULTS: The data collected from the three studies provided strong evidence for a competency model comprising 11 categories with a summary of the associated behavioural descriptions. Example competencies included empathy and sensitivity, communication skills, clinical knowledge and expertise, conceptual thinking, and coping with pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Triangulation of results was achieved from three independent studies. The competencies derived imply that a greater account of personal attributes needs to be considered in recruitment and training, rather than focusing on academic and clinical competency alone. The model could be employed for future research in design of selection techniques for the role of GP.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Patterson, E Ferguson, P Lane, K Farrell, J Martlew, A Wells. 2000. A competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10750226/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Problems for clinical judgement: 3. Thinking clearly in an emergency.

The resuscitation of a patient in extremis is frequently characterized by chaos and disorganization, and is one of the most stressful situations in medicine. We reviewed selected studies from the fields of anesthesia, emergency medicine and critical care that address the process of responding to a critically ill patient. Individual clinicians can improve their performance by increased exposure to emergencies during training and by the incorporation of teamwork, communication and crisis resource management principles into existing critical care courses. Team performance may be enhanced by assessing personality factors when selecting personnel for high-stress areas, explicit assignment of roles, ensuring a common "culture" in the team and routine debriefings. Over-reliance on technology and instinct at the expense of systematic responses should be avoided. Better training and teamwork may allow for clearer thinking in emergencies, so that knowledge can be translated into effective action and better patient outcomes.

Clinical Competence↗

The Structured Clinical Operative Test (SCOT) in dental competency assessment.

INTRODUCTION: This paper describes a method of assessment of invasive clinical procedures which are currently being devised, and which are perceived to be a method that may be used to complement OSCEs in overall clinical skills assessment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the Structured Clinical Operative Tests (SCOT) is to introduce a greater level of objectivity to the assessment of operative clinical skills. Invasive or irreversible clinical operative procedures from a large part of dental undergraduate training and are by their very nature precluded from OSCE scenarios. It is also important to test intraoperative skills, communication skills and contingency management, and performance of these with awareness of the psychosocial context and ethical framework. The paper describes the use of checklists in the monitoring of clinical operative skills in a more authentic clinical situation using the SCOT. FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: Continuous assessment should a) record achievement of competency in as objective a manner as possible and b) should encourage continuous self-evaluation. In the SCOT the students reflect on their clinical performance and in consultation with their supervisors record their plans to improve their competence in that skill or procedure in the future. This is done immediately on completion of a clinical task while the experience is still fresh in the mind. This encourages deep reflective learning as opposed to superficial factual learning which is characteristic of the more traditional curriculum, and is described as supervisor validated self-assessment. DISCUSSION: The discussion outlines how SCOTs can be practically implemented and integrated into the undergraduate curriculum and an example of a SCOT is appended to the paper. The scope for using SCOTs in postgraduate assessment such as in VT/GPT is also described.

Clinical Competence↗