PubMed · 1075701
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B Mattsson. 1976-01-01. [Edge cutting by enamel binding?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1075701/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: Develop a methodology to correlate microtensile bond strength (microTBS) and leakage within the same site of a specimen and evaluate the predominate debond and leakage pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Class II (MO) slot cavity was prepared in 37 extracted human molars and restored with indirect resin composite restorations. The restored teeth were thermocycled 300X between 5 and 55 degrees C and then stained with silver. Two specimens per tooth were obtained by diamond saw sectioning for measurement of leakage (microm) and microtensile bond strength (MPa) at the gingival wall and then tested for association with regression analysis. Scanning electron microscopy techniques and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were used to evaluate the debond and leakage pathways. RESULTS: Association between leakage and bond strength was not significant (t=1.31, p=0.198). All 74 samples debonded within the joint, predominantly at the hybrid layer-adhesive resin region with only one specimen including a small portion of resin cement in the debond pathway. Secondary and backscatter imaging and EDS analysis showed leakage in all samples that involved the hybrid layer. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a feasible method for evaluating leakage and bond strength at the joint interface within the same specimen.
Titanium abutments in dental implants shine through all-ceramic crowns and therefore limit excellent esthetic results. Prototypes of tooth-colored fiber-reinforced abutments were investigated to avoid the shining-through effect. In vitro, the fracture strength was determined after thermal cycling and mechanical loading of all-ceramic single crowns and four-unit bridges made of a fiber-reinforced composite. The suprastructures were adhesively fixed onto fiber-reinforced implant abutments and compared with those fixed on standard titanium abutments. The median of the fracture strength of the titanium-supported all-ceramic crowns was significantly higher than the median of crowns fixed onto the prototypes. But this value was still more than twice as high as the maximum loading force under oral conditions. No statistical difference was found between four-unit bridges made by fiber-reinforced composite inserted onto titanium abutments and those inserted onto fiber-reinforced abutments. Fiber-reinforced abutment prototypes for dental implants avoided the shining-through effect associated with metal abutments. Their load-bearing capacity after in vitro stress simulation was higher than the maximum oral loading force. With some improvements, the fiber-reinforced implant abutments are therefore a promising alternative to titanium abutments.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Provisional crowns traditionally have been associated with problems such as poor occlusion, contour, fit, and finish. Fabrication procedures should be uncomplicated and predictable within a realistic time frame. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of provisional restorations fabricated by dental students from 2 different materials (bis-acryl composite resin and PMMA) and identify the advantages and disadvantages associated with each material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study evaluated the occlusion, contour, marginal adaptation, and finish of 222 provisional crowns fabricated by 2 groups (A and B) of dental students. One bis-acryl composite resin material (Integrity) and 2 PMMA resins (C&B Resin and Snap) were evaluated. RESULTS: For group A, Integrity was statistically superior (P<.05) to C&B Resin in all 4 categories for anterior provisional crowns. For posterior provisional crowns, Integrity proved superior in the categories of contour and marginal adaptation, but no significant differences were established for occlusion and finish. For group B, Integrity was statistically superior to Snap in the categories of occlusion, contour, and marginal adaptation, whereas there was no statistical difference in finish. When all 4 categories were analyzed, Integrity was found to be statistically superior. CONCLUSION: Bis-acryl composite resin (Integrity) was significantly superior to PMMA (C&B Resin and Snap) as a provisional restorative material.