PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10764239

Neonatal hearing screening using the auditory brainstem response.

Abstract

A targeted screen of babies at risk of having a sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using the auditory brainstem response has been in place since 1987 in Bradford and Airedale. The aims of this paper were to ascertain what proportion of a 4-year cohort of children with SNHL should have been identified by the programme; was identified by the programme; and the reasons for failing when children were missed. The cohort of 49 children had moderate to profound SNHL (> 50 dB) and were born between 1 April 1991 and 31 March 1995. Although 92% had at risk factors (higher than in other series), 80% was the maximum that could have been prospectively detected by the programme and only 37% were actually diagnosed as a result of the screening programme. Apart from a generalised under-recruitment, children with risk factors arising because of in utero, perinatal and postnatal events (as opposed to family history, craniofacial abnormalities and syndromes) tended to be missed (P < 0.01). The overall yield of the screening programme was 0.5/1000/year. While the yield of a universal neonatal screening programme based on otoacoustic emissions should be double this, a targeted infant distraction test later in infancy will be an essential backup. Improved liaison with paediatricians in particular as well as simplification of the referral criteria should improve targeting children at risk.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Homer, S L Linney, D R Strachan. 2000. Neonatal hearing screening using the auditory brainstem response.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00334.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prognostic factors associated with the clinical outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cohort study in Japan.

One hundred and eighty-five Japanese women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were enrolled in this follow-up study. On the basis of the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in Japanese cervical cancer patients, HPV types were categorized into three groups as follows: (1) high risk (types 16, 18, 33, 52, and 58), (2) intermediate risk (types 31, 35, 39, 51, 56, 59, 68, and 70), (3) low risk (type 6, 30, 42, 53, 54, 55, 66 and unclassified types). High-risk HPV infection was a risk factor for progression of the disease. The regression rate in the HPV negative group was higher (83.3%) than those in the HPV positive groups, but the differences in regression were no longer significant after adjustment for age and CIN grade. It is also noted that a lower cytomegalovirus IgG level and a smaller number of past pregnancies might be associated with the regression of CIN lesions.

Cohort Studies↗

Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events.

OBJECTIVE: Detecting adverse events is pivotal for measuring and improving medical safety, yet current techniques discourage routine screening. The authors hypothesized that discharge summaries would include information on adverse events, and they developed and evaluated an electronic method for screening medical discharge summaries for adverse events. DESIGN: A cohort study including 424 randomly selected admissions to the medical services of an academic medical center was conducted between January and July 2000. The authors developed a computerized screening tool that searched free-text discharge summaries for trigger words representing possible adverse events. MEASUREMENTS: All discharge summaries with a trigger word present underwent chart review by two independent physician reviewers. The presence of adverse events was assessed using structured implicit judgment. A random sample of discharge summaries without trigger words also was reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent (251 of 424) of the discharge summaries contained trigger words. Based on discharge summary review, 44.8% (327 of 730) of the alerted trigger words indicated a possible adverse event. After medical record review, the tool detected 131 adverse events. The sensitivity and specificity of the screening tool were 69% and 48%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the tool was 52%. CONCLUSION: Medical discharge summaries contain information regarding adverse events. Electronic screening of discharge summaries for adverse events using keyword searches is feasible but thus far has poor specificity. Nonetheless, computerized clinical narrative screening methods could potentially offer researchers and quality managers a means to routinely detect adverse events.

Cohort Studies↗