PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10772514

Running suturing: the ideal length facilitates this task.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing is difficult, a complex task involving several integrated skills such as needle handling, suturing, and knotting. Running suturing is even more complex in the closed environment secondary to the angles of the suture lines, the tension maintained on the suture line, and the need to secure the ends, including tying a knot from the tail of the suture to the loop of the preceding stitch. We have hypothesized that the ideal suture length facilitates this process, and this study was specifically designed to determine the ideal suture length for an intracorporeal running suture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Latex phantoms were incised for 1 or 2 cm, and each was marked with black points to indicate suture entrance and exit sites. These marks were placed 2 mm from the incision, starting 2 mm proximally and ending 2 mm distally. Suture lengths could then be varied in direct proportion to the length of the incision, keeping all of these points as constants. The ratios of suture length:incision length were 9:1, 10:1, and 11:1. One surgeon performed all of the running suturing utilizing dry 3-0 coated polyglactin with a tapered SH needle. The times needed to create running suture lines were recorded (seconds), the number of ideal entrance and exit points tabulated, and the number of technical errors (missed movements resulting in prolonged suturing) recorded. RESULTS: The lengths of both the incision and the suture affect the ability to perform laparoscopic intracorporeal running suturing. As the incision increased, the suture:incision ratio of 9:1 resulted in the most efficient results (quickest suturing and fewest errors). In smaller suture lines (1 cm), the ratios 10:1 and 11:1 appeared better. CONCLUSIONS: A suture:incision ratio of 9:1 is best for longer suture lines and 10:1 is better for short suture lines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Desai, M E Moran, C J Calvano, A R Parekh. 2000. Running suturing: the ideal length facilitates this task.. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2000.14.191

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗