PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10780568

Defining GERD.

Abstract

"It is not the death of GERD that I seek, but that it turns from its evil ways and follows the path of righteousness." The reflux world is fully aware of what GERD is and what GERD does. What the world does not know, however, is the answer to the most important yet least asked question surrounding GERD's raison-d'etre: Why is GERD here and why do we have it? What GERD is: abnormal gastric reflux into the esophagus that causes any type of mischief. What GERD does: causes discomfort and/or pain with or without destroying the mucosa; causes stricture or stenosis, preventing food from being swallowed; sets the stage for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma; invades the surrounding lands to harass the peaceful oropharyngeal, laryngeal and broncho-pulmonary territories; reminds us that we are not only human, but that we are dust and ashes. Why GERD is here: We propose three separate and distinct etiologies of GERD, and we offer the following three hypotheses to explain why, after 1.5 million years of standing erect, we have evolved into a species (specifically Homosapiens sapiens) that is destined to live with the scourge of GERD. Hypothesis 1: congenital. The antireflux barrier, comprising the smooth-muscled lower esophageal sphincter, the skeletal-muscled right crural diaphragm and the phreno-esophageal ligament does not completely develop due to a developmental anomaly or incomplete gestation. Hypothesis 2: acute trauma: The antireflux barrier in adults suffering acute traumatic injury to the abdomen or chest is permanently disrupted by unexpected forces, such as motor vehicle accidents (with steering wheel crush impact), blows to the abdomen (from activities such as boxing, etc.), heavy lifting or moving (e.g., pianos, refrigerators) or stress positions (e.g., hand stands on parallel gym bars). The trauma creates a hiatal hernia that renders the antireflux mechanism useless and incapable of preventing GERD. Hypothesis 3: chronic trauma: The antireflux barrier in children and adults is gradually weakened over time as a result of chronic straining to defecate and straining in an unphysiologic position, both of which stem from our modern day habits of eating a low-fiber diet and living on the high-seated toilet. We suggest that the chronic traumatic hiatal hernia is (a) the cause of more than 90 percent of the GERD that stalks the Western world; (b) is a direct result of abandoning the popular and worldwide practice of squatting to socialize, eat and defecate; and (c) is our just reward for adopting the "civilized" high sitting position on chairs and modern toilets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Sontag. Defining GERD.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10780568/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Routine use of abdominal ultrasound and epigastric CT in polytrauma. Analysis oftherapeutic relevanc in 105 patients].

INTRODUCTION: A prospective analysis was done to determine the frequency of therapy relevance of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in multiple trauma patients in comparison to abdominal ultrasound (US). METHODS: We recorded all multiple trauma patients in the emergency room (n = 248) from August 1996 to July 1997 with an evaluation form and performed abdominal CT subsequent to US whenever the patient was hemodynamically stable and not in need of immediate surgery (n = 105). We documented the results of both methods and their impact on acute therapy. RESULTS: In 27 of 105 patients (25.7%) therapy management was influenced by both either US or CT. 76 patients (72.4%) showed normal US findings, followed by a CT which showed additional findings with therapeutic relevance in five patients (6.6%). Twenty-nine patients (27.6%) showed abnormal US findings. Compared to the therapeutic procedures proposed after the use of US the subsequently performed CT led to a change in therapy in 12 patients (41.4%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that if US is normal, additionally performed CT of the abdomen provides information of therapeutic relevance in only a limited number of cases. If US is abnormal, CT will have an important impact on therapy in a high number of patients.

Abdominal Injuries↗

[Isolated complete duodenal avulsion at the pylorus after blunt abdominal trauma].

We would like to place on record a case of an isolated complete duodenal avulsion distal to the pylorus after blunt abdominal trauma, in a 78-year-old patient. From all relevant literature, this is the first case known to us of duodenal rupture, around its complete circumference, in close proximity to the pylorus, which did not result in the injury of any further organs, in the absence of chronically infectious alterations. A duodenal injury in the case of blunt abdominal trauma is rare and amongst injuries to hollow organs is of no great importance. In isolated cases of duodenal injuries, it is normally the second or third section that is affected, both of which are fairly rigidly anchored to the retroperitoneum. If the first section is injured this is normally accompanied by considerable injury to the liver or head of the pancreas.

Abdominal Injuries↗