PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10789326

Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial.

E Walsh·M Rooney·L Appleby·G Wilkinson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most scientific journals practise anonymous peer review. There is no evidence, however, that this is any better than an open system. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility of an open peer review system. METHOD: Reviewers for the British Journal of Psychiatry were asked whether they would agree to have their name revealed to the authors whose papers they review; 408 manuscripts assigned to reviewers who agreed were randomised to signed or unsigned groups. We measured review quality, tone, recommendation for publication and time taken to complete each review. RESULTS: A total of 245 reviewers (76%) agreed to sign. Signed reviews were of higher quality, were more courteous and took longer to complete than unsigned reviews. Reviewers who signed were more likely to recommend publication. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the feasibility of an open peer review system and identifies such a system's potential drawbacks.

Explore related subjects

Feasibility StudiesHumansPeer ReviewPostal ServiceReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical TrialJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Walsh, M Rooney, L Appleby, G Wilkinson. 2000. Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial.. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.1.47

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A feasibility study on the use of visible and short wavelengths in the near-infrared region for the non-destructive measurement of wine composition.

The aim of this study was to explore the capability of spectroscopy in the visible (Vis) and short wavelength near-infrared (NIR) regions for the non-destructive measurement of wine composition in intact bottles. In this study we analysed a wide range of commercial wines obtained in Australia in different types of bottles (e.g. colours, diameters and heights), including different wine styles and varieties. Wine bottles were scanned in the Vis-NIR region (600-1,100 nm) in a monochromator instrument in transflectance mode. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares (PLS) regression were used to interpret the spectra and develop calibrations for wine composition. Due to the relatively small number of samples available full cross-validation (leave-one-out) was used as validation. The coefficient of correlation in calibration [Formula: see text] and the standard error of cross-validation (SECV) were 0.67 (SECV: 0.48%), 0.83 (SECV: 4.01 mg L-1), 0.70 (SECV: 28.6 mg L-1) and 0.50 (SECV: 0.15) for alcohol content, total SO2, free SO2 and pH, respectively, in the set of wine samples analysed. These preliminary results showed that the assessment of wine composition by Vis and short wavelengths in the NIR is possible for either qualitative analysis (e.g. low-, medium- and high-quality grading), or for screening of composition during bottling and storage. Although low accuracy and precision were obtained for the chemical parameters routinely analysed in wine, calibration models for the chemical parameters were considered acceptable for screening purposes in terms of the standard errors obtained.

Feasibility Studies↗
PubMed2007

Image-guided in vivo dosimetry for quality assurance of IMRT treatment for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: In external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and especially in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the accuracy of the dose distribution in the patient is of utmost importance. It was investigated whether image guided in vivo dosimetry in the rectum is a reliable method for online dose verification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one dose measurements were performed with an ionization chamber in the rectum of 7 patients undergoing IMRT for prostate cancer. The position of the probe was determined with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The point of measurement was determined relative to the isocenter and relative to an anatomic reference point. The dose deviations relative to the corresponding doses in the treatment plan were calculated. With an offline CT soft-tissue match, patient positioning after ultrasound was verified. RESULTS: The mean magnitude +/- standard deviation (SD) of patient positioning errors was 3.0 +/- 2.5 mm, 5.1 +/- 4.9 mm, and 4.3 +/- 2.4 mm in the left-right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal direction. The dose deviations in points at corresponding positions relative to the isocenter were -1.4 +/- 4.9% (mean +/- SD). The mean dose deviation at corresponding anatomic positions was 6.5 +/- 21.6%. In the rare event of insufficient patient positioning, dose deviations could be >30% because of the close proximity of the probe and the posterior dose gradient. CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided dosimetry in the rectum during IMRT of the prostate is a feasible and reliable direct method for dose verification when probe position is effectively controlled.

Feasibility Studies↗