PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10796122

External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of breech presentation is controversial, both in regard to manipulation of the position of the fetus and the method of delivery. External cephalic version may reduce the number of breech presentations and caesarean sections, but there also have been reports of increased perinatal mortality with the procedure. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of external cephalic version at term on measures of pregnancy outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register was searched. Date of last search: October 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of external cephalic version at term (with or without tocolysis) compared with no attempt at external cephalic version in women with breech presentation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by GJH and checked by RK. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies were included. External cephalic version at term was associated with a significant reduction in non-cephalic births (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.50) and caesarean section (relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.71). There was no significant effect on perinatal mortality (relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.92). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Attempting cephalic version at term appears to reduce the chance of non-cephalic births and caesarean section. There is not enough evidence to assess any risks of external cephalic version at term.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J Hofmeyr, R Kulier. 2000. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess UK obstetricians' preferences about mode of delivery for themselves or their partners and determine whether these changed since 1995. STUDY DESIGN: All 313 registered obstetricians in London and one in five (279) sample of those outside London were sent a structured anonymous postal questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 54%. In a hypothetical uncomplicated first singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation at term, 15% chose elective caesarean section (CS) (17% in London versus 13% outside London). The overall rate for London has not changed since 1995 (17 versus 17%), although the difference between women and men was less (31 versus 8% in 1995 and 21 versus 14% in 1999, respectively). The number choosing elective CS increased with estimated foetal weight > 4.0kg (40%) and > 4.5kg (65%) and with breech presentation both in a first pregnancy (69%) and after a previous vaginal delivery (49%). CONCLUSION: The overall attitude of London obstetricians to mode of delivery for themselves or their partners has not changed since 1995 and is similar to those of UK obstetricians elsewhere.

Breech Presentation↗