PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10796550

Interventions for treating tuberculous pericarditis.

Also available from

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous (TB) pericarditis is becoming more common. The infection can result in fluid around the heart, which can be fatal. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate evidence from trials about the effects of medical and surgical treatments for TB pericarditis on death and life-threatening conditions. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane controlled trials register, Medline, Embase and reference lists of articles; contact with experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of treatments for TB pericarditis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analysis using fixed effects models calculated summary statistics, provided there was no significant heterogeneity, and expressed results as relative risk. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 411 participants. Treatments were adjuvant steroids and surgical drainage. Two small trials tested steroids. There were fewer deaths (all causes) in the intervention group, but the numbers were small and the result could have occurred by chance (relative risk [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36 to 1.16, n = 350). In one trial studying patients with effusion, "cure" was higher in the steroid group (alive and free of disability at 2 years (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80, n = 221). One trial examined open surgical drainage compared with conservative management, and showed no impact of surgery on death, but a protective effective against cadiac tamponade (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.64). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Steroids have potentially large impacts on survival, but trials are too small to test this. We believe further placebo controlled trials of steroids are warranted, exploring whether the presence of effusion or fibrosis modifies effects. Surgical options also require further evaluation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B M Mayosi, J A Volmink, P J Commerford. 2000. Interventions for treating tuberculous pericarditis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000526

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rituximab for treatment of opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome in neuroblastoma.

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome that occurs in 2%-3% of patients with neuroblastoma. The cause of this syndrome is believed to be immune mediated, but the exact mechanism still remains unclear. There is an urgent need to improve our current strategies for treating patients with OMS, as many patients have significant long-term neurologic deficits and behavior disorders with current treatment approaches. Therapies that have shown to improve symptoms in these patients have ranged from ACTH and corticosteroids, to intravenous gammaglobulin and plasmapheresis. We report our experience with Rituximab in a patient with neuroblastoma and OMS.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: the CAESAR Study.

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗