PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10796776

Interventions for emergency contraception.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine which emergency contraceptive method following unprotected intercourse is the most effective, safe and convenient for use in preventing pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: The search strategy included electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Popline, Chinese biomedical databases and HRP emergency contraception database. In addition, references of retrieved papers were searched and researchers in the field and two pharmaceutical companies were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized studies including women attending services for emergency contraception following a single act of unprotected intercourse were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on outcomes and trial characteristics were extracted in duplicate by two reviewers. Results were expressed as relative risk using a fixed-effects model with 95 % confidence interval. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen trials were included in the review. The majority (8/15) of the trials were conducted in China. Most comparisons between different interventions included one or two trials although some trials were appropriately sized with power calculations. Levonorgestrel appears to be more effective than Yuzpe regimen (2 trials, RR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.31-0.84) and causes less side-effects (RR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 0.84). Levonorgestrel was less effective than locally manufactured mifepristone in a single, large Chinese study (RR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.00 to 4.77). Effectiveness of different doses of mifepristone seem to be similar but the frequency of delay in onset of the subsequent menstrual period increases with increased dose. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Levonorgestrel and mifepristone seem to offer the highest efficacy with an acceptable side-effect profile. One disadvantage of mifepristone is that it causes delays in onset of subsequent menses which may induce anxiety. However, this seems to be dose-related and low doses of mifepristone minimise this side-effect without compromising effectiveness. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of mifepristone with levonorgestrel.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Cheng, A M Gülmezoglu, E Ezcurra, P F Van Look. 2000. Interventions for emergency contraception.. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001324

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed data on effects of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills on pregnancy rates and use of the pills. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, POPLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS, and we consulted with experts. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that compared the effect of different levels of access to emergency contraceptive pills on pregnancy rates, use of the pills, and other outcomes. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of the 717 articles identified, we selected 23 for review. The studies included randomized trials, cohort studies, and evaluations of community interventions. The quality of these studies varied. In all but one study, increased access to emergency contraceptive pills was associated with greater use. However, no study found an effect on pregnancy or abortion rates. CONCLUSION: Increased access to emergency contraceptive pills enhances use but has not been shown to reduce unintended pregnancy rates. Further research is needed to explain this finding and to define the best ways to use emergency contraception to produce a public health benefit.

Contraceptives, Postcoital↗