PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10809934

Duane's syndrome.

Abstract

Duane's syndrome is an unusual congenital form of strabismus where there is paradoxical anomalous lateral rectus innervation of the affected eye due to misdirection of axons destined for the medial rectus. Three types of Duane's syndrome are recognized. Most cases of Duane's syndrome are sporadic but up to 10% are familial, usually with autosomal dominant inheritance. Several autosomal dominant syndromes with dysmorphic features are associated with Duane's syndrome. Chromosomal loci for genes contributing to Duane's syndrome have been suggested at 4q, 8q and 22q. Duane's syndrome is heterogeneous at multiple levels with variations in its ocular manifestations, accompanying systemic manifestations and in the chromosomal loci with which it may be associated. The definition clinically and genetically of the various subgroups of Duane's syndrome will provide a valuable insight into brainstem axonal guidance to the extraocular muscles during human development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N J Gutowski. 2000. Duane's syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00029.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Properties of saccades in Duane retraction syndrome.

PURPOSE: To improve understanding of the binocular control of saccades by making high-resolution eye movement recordings in patients with unilateral Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) type I (marked by congenital absence of the sixth cranial nerve). METHODS: Binocular eye movements were recorded in four patients in binocular viewing conditions during a saccade task. RESULTS: Affected-side gaze showed normal saccades of the sound eye and undershooting saccades of the affected eye-evidence of intact interneurons, but deficient motoneurons, in the sixth-nerve nucleus on the affected side. Postsaccadic smooth onward drift followed undershooting saccades of the affected eye. Sound-side gaze, in the centripetal direction, showed relatively accurate saccades despite large offsets in initial position between the two eyes. In the centrifugal direction, there was a consistent undershoot of the affected eye. The sound eye showed unexpected overshoot. Postsaccadic drifts in opposite directions in the two eyes brought both eyes onto the target in an optimal time course. CONCLUSIONS: Studying the characteristics of the saccadic system in this oculomotor disorder gives new insight into binocular control of saccades and adaptation. In these patients, the oculomotor system was not capable of adapting the pulse command to the two eyes separately, even though DRS offers clear advantages of independent control. In contrast, independent adaptation of the saccadic step command was sent to the two eyes. This supports the idea that the rapid part of the saccadic command is common to both eyes.

Duane Retraction Syndrome↗