PubMed · 10811067
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J C Sanchez-Thorin. 2000. More on simultaneous versus sequential LASIK.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00121-4
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To define the physicochemical parameters of viscoelastics that are most important for visual acuity after phacoemulsification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven commercially available viscoelastics (ophthalmic viscosurgical device, OVD) were used in consecutive cataract operations. In addition to clinical findings, we assessed visual acuity, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, and pachymetric data preoperatively and on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: On the first postoperative day the loss of endothelial cells in all phacoemulsifications was 0.661%, corrected for 1 s phacotime, while corneal thickness increased by 0.2384% and visual acuity by 5.206%, and intraocular pressure decreased by 0.306%. The most important parameters for visual acuity were the concentration of sodium hyaluronate and viscosity (100/s.) of the OVD. Pachymetric data were more relevant for postoperative visual acuity than endothelial cell counts. CONCLUSION: Early visual rehabilitation after phacoemulsification depends on stable pachymetric data. OVD with a high content of sodium hyaluronate and high viscosity significantly reduces corneal swelling and improves visual acuity after phacoemulsifications on the first postoperative day.
PATIENT: A 63-year-old female with bilateral recurrent corneal ulcerations for 10 years, suffered from vascularisation of the cornea and absence of corneal sensitivity. Other symptoms were multifocal hypoaesthesia with hypalgesia of hands and legs, generalised lack of deep tendon reflexes, absence of somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) in these regions. A sural biopsy demonstrated extreme lack of myelinated fibres. Acquired causes for polyneuropathy were excluded. THERAPY: Subsequent to local ocular treatment we carried out a perforating corneal transplantation of the left eye because of corneal scars. This had to be repeated 2 years later because of vascularisation of the transplant. The visual function of the left eye could be stabilised at values between 0.2 and 1/50. CONCLUSION: Anamnesis and clinical symptoms of the patient are compatible with the diagnosis of hereditary sensory neuropathy type II (HSN II) affecting the trigeminal nerves. In patients with neuropathy and impaired corneal sensitivity, a favourable prognosis may be achieved by a corneal transplant.