PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10813204

Constrictive (obliterative) bronchiolitis.

Abstract

Constrictive bronchiolitis (CB), also termed in lung transplant patients obliterative bronchiolitis, is inflammation and fibrosis occurring predominantly in the walls and contiguous tissues of membranous and respiratory bronchioles with resultant narrowing of their lumens. CB is found in a variety of settings, most often as a complication of lung and heart-lung transplantation (affecting 34% to 39% of patients, usually in the first 2 years after transplantation) and bone marrow transplantation, but also in rheumatoid arthritis, after inhalation of toxic agents such as nitrogen dioxide, after ingestion of certain drugs such as penicillamine and ingestion of the East Asian vegetable Sauropus androgynous, and as a rare complication of adenovirus, influenza type A, measles, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. In lung transplants, CB is the single most important factor leading to death thereafter. In one study, the overall mortality rate was 25%. However, at the same time, 87% of patients who were asymptomatic and diagnosed solely by transbronchial biopsy had resolution or stabilization of disease. Decreases in FEV1 from baseline can be used to clinically support CB in transplant patients; the term bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is used to denote this clinical dysfunction, and a grading system has been established for it that is now widely used in the literature. Significant risk factors for the development of CB in lung transplants include alloantigen-dependent and -independent mechanisms. In the former group are late acute rejection and HLA mismatches at the A loci; in the latter are ischemia/reperfusion injuries to airways that result from the transplantation surgery and cytomegalovirus infection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Schlesinger, S Veeraraghavan, M N Koss. 1998. Constrictive (obliterative) bronchiolitis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-199809000-00008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression in human cancer.

Erythropoietin (EPO) stimulates the growth of erythroblasts in the bone marrow (C. Lacombe and P. Mayeux, NEPHROL: DIAL: TRANSPLANT:, 14 (SUPPL: 2): 22-28, 1999). We report basal and hypoxia-stimulated expression of EPO and its receptor, EPOR, in human breast cancer cells, and we demonstrate EPO-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation and the proliferation of these cells in vitro. In 50 clinical specimens of breast carcinoma, we report high levels of EPO and EPOR associated with malignant cells and tumor vasculature but not with normal breast, benign papilloma, or fibrocystic tissue. Hypoxic tumor regions display the highest levels of EPO and EPOR expression. Enhanced EPO signaling may contribute to the promotion of human cancer by tissue hypoxia.

Biopsy↗

Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) remains an enigma for the treating physician, because it encompasses both benign, reactive, as well as preneoplastic and possibly neoplastic conditions. To address this problem, The Bethesda System recommends qualifying the ASCUS diagnosis. This study analyzes the difference in the follow-up results between the various groups of patients with an ASCUS diagnosis as outlined by the Criteria Committee: favor premalignant (ASCUS-P), favor reactive (ASCUS-R), and unqualified (ASCUS-C). The outcome, based on follow-up biopsies and/or cytologies, for both the conventional Papanicolaou smear (CS) and liquid-based (LB) methodologies is compared. METHODS: The CS and LB biopsies and/or cytologies included 590 patients and 137 patients, respectively, who had an initial diagnosis of ASCUS. The final outcome after subsequent biopsy and cytology within a 1-year period for each methodology was tabulated. Furthermore, the addition of qualifiers for each diagnosis was tabulated for both cytology and biopsy follow-up and compared between CS and LB technologies. RESULTS: For CS, 29 patients (8.6%) were found to have squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) on subsequent cytologic smears, and 176 patients (63.7%) had SIL on biopsy follow-up. For LB, these numbers were 17 patients (19.1%) and 56 patients (65.1%), respectively. Regardless of the qualification used in the initial CS biopsy or cytology, over 90% of the subsequent smears resulted in a benign diagnosis. Biopsy outcomes after CS diagnoses of ASCUS-P, ASCUS-R, and ASCUS-C showed SIL in 80%, 53%, and 66% of patients, respectively. For LB diagnoses, subsequent smears detected SIL in 33% of patients with a diagnosis of ASCUS-P, 22% of patients with a diagnosis of ASCUS-R, and 12% of patients with a diagnosis of ASCUS-C. Biopsy outcomes after LB diagnoses of ASCUS-P, ASCUS-R, and ASCUS-C showed SIL in 68%, 64%, and 66% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no statistically valid benefit from a clinical point of view in qualifying an ASCUS interpretation by either CS or LB, except for CS evaluation of patients with a diagnosis of ASCUS-P.

Biopsy↗