PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10815775

Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.

Abstract

The present paper evaluates the claim that abstract conceptual domains are structured through metaphorical mappings from domains grounded directly in experience. In particular, the paper asks whether the abstract domain of time gets its relational structure from the more concrete domain of space. Relational similarities between space and time are outlined along with several explanations of how these similarities may have arisen. Three experiments designed to distinguish between these explanations are described. The results indicate that (1) the domains of space and time do share conceptual structure, (2) spatial relational information is just as useful for thinking about time as temporal information, and (3) with frequent use, mappings between space and time come to be stored in the domain of time and so thinking about time does not necessarily require access to spatial schemas. These findings provide some of the first empirical evidence for Metaphoric Structuring. It appears that abstract domains such as time are indeed shaped by metaphorical mappings from more concrete and experiential domains such as space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Boroditsky. 2000-04-14. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00073-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Is multiple chemical sensitivity a clinically defined entity?

In 1996 a WHO/IPCS Workshop has suggested to use as an appropriate descriptor of MCS the broader term "Idiopathic Environmental Intolerances (IEI)", in order to incorporate "a number of disorders sharing similar symptomatologies". Research was strongly encouraged. The following points have been put forward as a precondition to define MCS as a clinical entity: (a) establishment of diagnostic criteria, (b) identification of pathogenic mechanisms, together with, (c) an explanation of relationship between exposures and symptoms. Against this background, progress made in the fields of sensory physiology and neurobehaviour research must be debated. In particular, recent results on processing of cognitive stimuli have to be considered. IEI/MCS patients exhibited differences vs. controls in their reactions to intranasal challenge, consistent with changes in cognitive processing of suprathreshold chemosensory information. Trait anxiety and focus of attention have clearly been identified as major components in eliciting neurobehavioural MCS symptoms. Hence, the question as to whether MCS should be regarded as a clinically defined entity remains controversial, but important progress can be noticed in elucidating and defining the nature of this phenomenon, by a combined effort of several disciplines (toxicology and behavioural toxicology, psychology and psychophysiology, and clinical medicine). The new situation will call for a re-evaluation of traditional positions.

Cognition↗

Human electrophysiological and cognitive effects of exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF modulated RF and microwave fields: a review of recent studies.

The investigation of weak (<500 microT), extremely low frequency (ELF, 0-300 Hz) magnetic field (MF) exposure upon human cognition and electrophysiology has yielded incomplete and contradictory evidence that MFs interact with human biology. This may be due to the small number of studies undertaken examining ELF MF effects upon the human electroencephalogram (EEG), and the associated analysis of evoked related potentials (ERPs). Relatively few studies have examined how MF exposure may affect cognitive and perceptual processing in human subjects. The introduction of this review considers some of the recent studies of ELF MF exposure upon the EEG, ERPs and cognitive and perceptual tasks. We also consider some of the confounding factors within current human MF studies and suggest some new strategies for further experimentation.

Cognition↗