PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10815811

Going virtual with quicktime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures.

R B Trelease·G L Nieder·J Dørup·M S Hansen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Continuing evolution of computer-based multimedia technologies has produced QuickTime, a multiplatform digital media standard that is supported by stand-alone commercial programs and World Wide Web browsers. While its core functions might be most commonly employed for production and delivery of conventional video programs (e.g., lecture videos), additional QuickTime VR "virtual reality" features can be used to produce photorealistic, interactive "non-linear movies" of anatomical structures ranging in size from microscopic through gross anatomic. But what is really included in QuickTime VR and how can it be easily used to produce novel and innovative visualizations for education and research? This tutorial introduces the QuickTime multimedia environment, its QuickTime VR extensions, basic linear and non-linear digital video technologies, image acquisition, and other specialized QuickTime VR production methods. Four separate practical applications are presented for light and electron microscopy, dissectable preserved specimens, and explorable functional anatomy in magnetic resonance cinegrams.

Explore related subjects

Anatomy, Cross-SectionalComputer-Assisted InstructionHeadHumansInternetKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, VideoModels, AnatomicMotion PicturesMultimediaTime FactorsUser-Computer InterfaceVideo RecordingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R B Trelease, G L Nieder, J Dørup, M S Hansen. 2000-04-15. Going virtual with quicktime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(20000415)261%3A2%3C64%3A%3Aaid-ar6%3E3.0.co%3B2-o

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

An alternative histochemical method to simultaneously demonstrate muscle nuclei and muscle fibre type.

We present a modified histochemical method to examine, simultaneously, nuclei and fibre type in human skeletal muscle. The new procedure (Haem-ATPase) is based on two previously used histochemical protocols. Biopsies were obtained from the rectus abdominis muscle of patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Fibre type composition, cross-sectional area (CSA) and nuclei to fibre ratio (N:F) were determined from frozen sections of each biopsy. To test the validity of the new method, serial sections of each biopsy were stained separately using the standard and modified methods. No differences were found in fibre type distribution, mean-weighted CSA and N:F when comparing the modified method with the standard methods. The Haem-ATPase method was found to shrink fibre size by at least 3% ( P>0.05) compared with the established myosin acid labile method. We propose that this modified technique is suitable for initial examination of both the nuclei and fibre type in the same frozen sections of human skeletal muscle.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗
PubMed2003

Acoustic rhinometry in dog and cat compared with a fluid-displacement method and magnetic resonance imaging.

An increasing number of studies have used acoustic rhinometry (AR) for study of pharmacological interventions on nasal cavity dimensions in dogs and cats, but there have been no attempts to validate AR in these species. This is done in the present study. We compared area-distance relationships of nasal cavities from five decapitated dogs (3.5-41 kg) and cats (3.8-6 kg). AR was compared with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and a fluid-displacement method (FDM) using perfluorocarbon. AR measured 88% (98-79%) (mean and 95% confidence interval) of nasal cavity volume in dogs determined by FDM and 71% (83-59%) in cats. AR markedly underestimated nasal cavity dimensions when minimum areas were below 0.1 cm2 in dogs and 0.05 cm2 in cats. AR underestimation increased with the severity of the constriction and with distance. Cross-sectional areas in the deeper parts of the cavity measured 76% (99-54%) of FDM in dogs and 52% (66-39%) in cats. AR agreed well with MR, especially in the deeper part of the cavity. MR images showed that the nasal cavities had a very complex structure not expected to be reproduced by AR. MR could not be considered a "gold standard" because definition of the cross-sectional area of the lumen depended critically on subjective choices. FDM produced repeatable measurements and possibly offers the most adequate reference in future evaluation of AR. AR underestimated what we believed were the most correct cross-sectional areas determined by FDM, especially in the deeper part of the dog and cat nasal cavities. Despite these difficulties, AR has been shown to be useful to describe qualitative changes in cross-sectional area.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗
PubMed2003

Effects of the nasal valve on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study.

The influence of nasal valve on acoustic rhinometry (AR) measurements was evaluated by using simple nasal cavity models. Each model consisted of a cylindrical pipe with an insert simulating the nasal valve. The AR-determined cross-sectional areas beyond the insert were consistently underestimated, and the corresponding area-distance curves showed pronounced oscillations. The area underestimation was more pronounced in models with inserts of small passage area. The experimental results are discussed in terms of theoretically calculated "sound-power reflection coefficients" for the pipe models. The reason for area underestimation is reflection of most of the incident sound power from the barrier at the front junction between the pipe and the insert. It was also demonstrated that the oscillations are due to low-frequency acoustic resonances in the portion of the pipe beyond the insert. The results suggest that AR does not provide reliable information about the cross-sectional areas of the nasal cavity posterior to a significant constriction, such as pathologies narrowing the nasal valve area. When the passage area of the nasal valve is decreased, the role of AR as a diagnostic tool for the entire nasal cavity becomes limited.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗