PubMed · 10820664
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1999. TJ 960.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-199902020-00018
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A new analytical method for vigabatrin based on capillary electrophoretic separation and laser-induced fluorescence detection has been developed. 5-Carboxytetramethylrhodamine succinimidyl ester was used for precolumn derivatization of the non-fluorescent drug. Optimal separation and detection were obtained with an electrophoretic buffer of 50 mM sodium borate (pH9.5) containing 10 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate and a green He-Ne laser (excitation at 543.5 nm, emission at 589 nm). The concentration limit of detection in aqueous solution was 24 nM. Combined with a simple cleanup procedure, this method can be applied to the determination of vigabatrin in human plasma. A calibration curve ranging from 1.5 to 200 microM shown to be linear. Both the within-day and day-to-day reproducibilities and accuracies were less then 14.3% and 4.9% respectively. The limit of detection of vigabatrin in plasma was about 0.13 microM
A topological virtual screening (tvs) test is presented, which is capable of identifying new drug leaders with anticonvulsant activity. Molecular structures of both anticonvulsant-active and non active compounds, extracted from the Merck Index database, were represented using topological indexes. By means of the application of a linear discriminant analysis to both sets of structures, a topological anticonvulsant model (tam) was obtained, which defines a connectivity function. On the basis of this model, 41 new structures with anticonvulsant activity have been identified by a topological virtual screening.
BACKGROUND: New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have provided alternatives to traditional treatment paradigms for status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: To determine current treatment preferences for generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE), we surveyed 106 members of the Critical Care or Epilepsy sections of the American Academy of Neurology. RESULTS: Most respondents initially treat patients with intravenous (IV) lorazepam (76%), followed by phenytoin or fosphenytoin (95%) if first-line therapy fails. Preferences for GCSE refractory to two AEDs (RSE) varied: 43% would give phenobarbital, 19% would give one of three continuous-infusion (cIV) AEDs (pentobarbital, midazolam, propofol), and 16% would give IV valproic acid. About half indicated "burst suppression" (56%) and half indicated "elimination of seizures" (41%) as the titration goal for cIV-AED therapy. About half (42%) would add a new cIV-AED, and the other half (41%) would not add another agent to treat electrographic SE refractory to four AEDs. DISCUSSION: In accordance with published trials and general guidelines, neurologists most often use lorazepam followed by phenytoin or fosphenytoin as first-line and second-line therapies for GCSE. There is no consensus for third-line or fourth-line treatment for RSE. The treatment of RSE needs to be studied in a large, prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.