PubMed · 10820994
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Cassella, R L Ashford. 2000. Sensory testing using neurothesiometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10820994/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A simple and inexpensive method for recording vertical movements of the human mandible relative to the maxilla is presented. Measurements are made from accelerometers and a Hall-effect device temporarily glued to the upper and lower anterior teeth. The accelerometer signals are integrated once to give velocity and a second time to give position. Movements of the mandible relative to the maxilla are obtained by integrating the difference between the two accelerometer signals. The (relative) velocity and position records derived in this way are linear, but subject to drift when the jaw is stationary. Steady mandibular position is obtained from the Hall-effect system, but this signal must be corrected for its inherent non-linearity. This device can record rapid movements of the mandible even when the head is unrestrained, and interferes minimally with normal jaw movements.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Assays for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) face two challenges: the emergence of sensitive techniques for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA and the existence of HBsAg mutant hepatitis B viruses. We studied the sensitivity of five modern assays for detection of HBsAg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sensitivity of two mini robot-based assays--IMx HBsAg V2 and Vidas HBsAg--and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with microtitre plate format--Hepanostika Uni-Form II v1.2, Monolisa Ag HBs Plus and HBsAg Test System 3--was compared testing 11 HBsAg seroconversion series, serial dilutions prepared from three HBsAg standards and nine HBsAg mutant samples. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall, the IMx HBsAg V2 assay showed the highest sensitivity. It outperformed the Vidas HBsAg in analytical sensitivity and in detection of HBsAg mutants. Among the microtitre plate ELISAs, the Monolisa Ag HBs Plus outperformed the HBsAg Test System 3 in detection of HBsAg mutants and it surpassed the Hepanostika Uni-Form II v1.2 in analytical sensitivity.