PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10824499

Cognitive functioning after whiplash injury: a meta-analysis.

Abstract

Complaints on cognitive functioning are often reported in patients suffering from whiplash syndrome, although objective neuropsychological test results do not always support these. In addition, radiological abnormalities and anatomical lesions are found only in a minority of these patients. This has led to a controversy about its existence in the literature. In this systematic review, the results of 22 neuropsychological studies on whiplash were quantitatively analyzed, focusing on working memory, attention, immediate and delayed recall, visuomotor tracking, and cognitive flexibility. Our findings suggest that a consistent overall pattern of cognitive dysfunction can be demonstrated after whiplash injury through neuropsychological testing, both compared to healthy and to asymptomatic controls. Six months after the accident, improvement is found in working memory, attention, immediate recall, and visuomotor tracking. The results are discussed in the light of recent findings on the effect of cerebral dysfunction, malingering, pain-related factors, and the role of coping strategies and posttraumatic stress on neuropsychological test performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R P Kessels, A Aleman, W I Verhagen, E L van Luijtelaar. 2000. Cognitive functioning after whiplash injury: a meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617700633027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Insufficient cooperativeness in forensic neuropsychiatric assessment: prevalence estimates of negative response bias].

In the context of independent medical examinations, negative response bias in patients is a problem of primary importance, especially in cases where self-reported symptoms cannot be directly verified by the examiner. Estimates of the prevalence of uncooperativeness in neuropsychological evaluations demonstrated that invalid test profiles are to be expected in a sizable minority of examinees. However, no estimates have ever been published in German-speaking countries. Symptom validity was checked in 235 patients who reported cognitive symptoms after suffering an accident and who underwent forensic neuropsychiatric assessment. Patient classification was based on the results obtained with the Word Memory Test (WMT) or the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT). When applying the recommended cutoffs for these tests, 44.3 percent of the sample was found to be classified as suspect for insufficient effort. In a subsample of 47 patients with claims of posttraumatic stress disorder 51.1 percent were found to score below the cutoffs. These findings underline the importance of modern methods for assessment of symptom validity in forensic contexts. Cooperativeness of compensation claimants cannot be assumed solely on the basis of clinical impression.

Brain Injury, Chronic↗

Further documentation of remote effects of electrical injuries, with comments on the place of neuropsychological testing and functional scanning.

It is not always recognized that morbidity from electrical injury is not confined to effects in the pathway of current flow. Indeed a major element of the disability suffered by victims occur from effects remote to the line of current passage. Recent papers have rightly drawn further attention to this, and it is an active area of controversy and research. This paper documents the authors experience in this area and confirms the recognizable elements of remote injuries which are seen to be generally psychological in nature. The question of mechanisms of causation of these disabilities is raised. This paper then presents summary results of a collation of neuropsychological investigations and functional cerebral scanning in an attempt to correlate the two. It is concluded that it is possible to overlook the remote effects of electrical injury to the detriment of victims.

Brain Injury, Chronic↗