PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10827638

What can the postanesthesia care unit manager do to decrease costs in the postanesthesia care unit?

Abstract

The economic structure of the PACU dictates whether a cost-reducing intervention (e.g., reducing the length of time patients stay in the PACU) is likely to decrease hospital costs. Cost-reducing interventions, such as changes in medical practice patterns (e.g., to reduce PACU length of stay), only impact variable costs. How PACU nurses are paid (e.g., salaried v hourly) affects which strategies to decrease PACU staffing costs will actually save money. For example, decreases in PACU labor costs resulting from increases in the number of patients that bypass the PACU vary depending on how the staff is compensated. The choice of anesthetic drugs and the elimination of low morbidity side effects of anesthesia, such as postoperative nausea, are likely to have little effect on the peak numbers of patients in a PACU and PACU staffing costs. Because the major determinant of labor productivity in the PACU is hour-to-hour and day-to-day variability in the timing of admissions from the operating room, a more even inflow of patients into the PACU could be attained by appropriate sequencing of cases in the operating room suite (e.g., have long cases scheduled at the beginning of the day). However, this mathematically proven solution may not be desirable. Surgeons, for example, may not want to lose control over the order of their cases. Guidelines for analysis of past daily peak numbers of patients are provided that will provide data to predict the minimum adequate number of nurses needed. Though many managers already do this manually on an ad hoc basis statistical methods summarized in this article may increase the accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Macario, D Glenn, F Dexter. 1999. What can the postanesthesia care unit manager do to decrease costs in the postanesthesia care unit?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1089-9472(99)80036-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Past and present attempts to control health service expenditure and its effects on National Health dentistry.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the methods used by policy makers to try to reduce or limit expenditure within the National Health Service. METHOD: A chronological examination of cost related health care policy and its wider impact on society. Comparison of past developments in the NHS with new methods of health care organisation in the United Kingdom (UK). The experiences of two dental Total Purchasing Pilots are used to describe where the dental profession now stands in relation to current NHS developments. RESULTS: The introduction of Primary Care Groups (PCGs) constitutes part of a continued effort by health care policy makers to control expenditure on health services. In the PCG system, as in Total Purchasing (TP), a group of primary care practitioners control a finite budget. These groups therefore must decide which health care services should be available to the population they represent. Inevitably such systems result in the rationing of health care, but the decisions are instigated by primary health care professionals rather than by government edict. CONCLUSION: Unless GDPs are allowed, willing and able, to participate in and influence the newly emerging Primary Care Groups and Trusts, dental services may once again be pushed to the fringe of NHS care provision. Without adequate representation, the value of dental care may not be recognised and PCGs may decide to make use of traditional dental resources, to fund other services.

Cost Control↗