Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?

J N Amoore; D H Scott

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10828894

Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?

J N Amoore·D H Scott

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure (NIBP) monitors estimate the arterial pressure using model-specific signal processing and algorithms. Hence each model's accuracy must be clinically evaluated. Simulators may assist the evaluation, but their ability to do so has not been verified. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether simulators can detect systematic differences between NIBP monitors. METHODS: We tested whether a simulator can distinguish between the two different algorithms available in a particular monitor, detect calibration errors and detect systematic differences between monitors that are observed clinically. RESULTS: Simulator evaluation correctly detected 1.8 and 4.2 mmHg systolic and diastolic differences between the two Nellcor N-3100 algorithms (with specified 2 and 5 mmHg differences) but found no difference between their mean arterial pressures (as expected from the specification). Simulator evaluations detected calibration adjustments at 80/50, 120/80 and 200/150 mmHg. Simulator and clinical comparisons of two devices of the same type recording slightly different blood pressures were in close agreement, but simulator and clinical comparisons of three different models (Propaq, Critikon DINAMAP and Datex Cardiocap) were not consistently in agreement. The simulators generated oscillometric pulse shapes different from physiological recordings. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, although simulators can reveal systematic differences between devices of the same model, they cannot be used to detect systematic differences between different NIBP models. This could be at least partly because the oscillometric pulses generated by the simulators are dissimilar to physiologically recorded pulses.

Explore related subjects

Algorithms Blood Pressure Determination Blood Pressure Monitors Calibration Computer Simulation Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Models, Biological Oscillometry Posture Supine Position Comparative Study Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J N Amoore, D H Scott. 2000. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10828894/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

A note on a generalized single step theory for any number of hierarchical genomic matrices.

BACKGROUND: The Single Step algorithm allows combining information from genotyped and un-genotyped individuals, provided they are connected by a pedigree. However, current single step theory is limited to a single list of markers. RESULTS: We present a generalized single step (GSS) method that can accommodate any number of hierarchical molecular datasets (e.g. sequence, high and low density arrays) and pedigree, avoiding imputation. We prove that a similar efficient inversion algorithm exists. The method is recursive, starting with the highest marker density scenario. We illustrate the method with simulation and show that GSS can increase predictive accuracy compared to standard single step. R code is provided so that custom scenarios can be easily compared, either with simulated or real data. CONCLUSION: The method developed generalizes extant single step theory to any number of hierarchical molecular relationship matrices, broadening the scenarios where single step can be applied. A topic of particular interest can be ecology field data or human populations where pedigree is not available, but where samples sequenced and genotyped at different densities can exist. GSS can also be a useful tool to optimize allocation of genotyping and / or sequencing resources.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2026

cgDist: Nucleotide-level distance calculation from cgMLST allelic profiles.

Bacterial genomic surveillance requires balancing computational efficiency with genetic resolution for effective cluster investigation. cgMLST distance calculations treat all allelic differences as equivalent units, obscuring nucleotide-level variation. Furthermore, single nucleotide polymorphism-based pipelines provide finer resolution at substantially higher computational cost, which limits their routine deployment in surveillance laboratories. We present cgDist, an algorithm that calculates nucleotide-level distances directly from cgMLST allelic profiles, providing finer resolution than allele-count distances by leveraging within-allele nucleotide variation. The cache architecture stores alignment statistics, enabling distance calculation modes without computation and supporting both dataset-specific and schema-complete cache generation. This design enables incremental surveillance analysis, with performance benefits as laboratories accumulate alignment data. cgDist functions as a precision 'zoom lens' for the investigation of clusters identified through initial cgMLST screening. Rather than restructuring population relationships, this targeted approach concentrates enhanced resolution where it is most informative. The algorithm ensures that cgDist distances are greater than or equal to corresponding cgMLST distances, preserving epidemiological interpretability while adding genetic discrimination. By increasing resolution within identified clusters, cgDist may also support outbreak investigation, a potential application that remains to be evaluated on outbreak-derived data.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2026

Theseus: fast and optimal affine-gap sequence-to-graph alignment.

MOTIVATION: Sequence-to-graph alignment is a central problem in bioinformatics, with applications in multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and pangenome analysis, among others. However, current algorithms for optimal affine-gap alignment impose high memory and computational requirements, limiting their scalability to aligning long sequences to complex graphs. Practical solutions partially address this problem using heuristic strategies that ultimately trade off optimality for speed. RESULTS: This work presents Theseus, a novel, fast, and optimal affine-gap sequence-to-graph alignment algorithm. Theseus leverages similarities between genomic sequences to accelerate the alignment computation and reduces the overall memory requirements without compromising optimality. To that end, Theseus processes only a subset of the dynamic programming cells, using a sparse-data strategy that enables efficient sequence-to-graph alignment. Moreover, our algorithm supports optimal affine-gap alignment on arbitrary directed graphs, including those with cycles. We evaluate Theseus on two key problems: MSA and pangenome read mapping. For MSA, we compare it against SPOA, abPOA, and POASTA. Theseus is 1.6× to 17.6× faster than POASTA, and 7.3× faster, on average, than SPOA, both optimal aligners. Compared with abPOA, Theseus ensures optimality and scales to the largest problems. For pangenome read mapping, we benchmark Theseus against the alignment stage of the mapping tool vg map, along with the alignment kernels of SPOA, abPOA, and POASTA. Theseus outperforms the other methods, showing a 1.9× to 16.9× speedup on short reads. Moreover, Theseus is 1.5× to 36.3× faster than vg when aligning against synthetic cyclic graphs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Theseus code and documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/albertjimenezbl/theseus-lib.

Algorithms↗