PubMed · 10829367
Digital cataract photography.
Abstract
This study compares the cost effectiveness of two methods of grading cataract changes in the Australian population. The conventional film-based method has comparatively low set-up costs, but is more subjective in its assessment and more reliant on manpower, while the digital method has high set-up costs, but the results are more objective and available more quickly using fewer people. By a careful assessment of all the costs involved it is possible to estimate how many participants need to be recruited to a study in order to make the digital method cost effective.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Dimock, L D Robman, C A McCarty, H R Taylor. 2000. Digital cataract photography.. https://doi.org/10.1080/014051100101790
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.