PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10830388

Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.

Abstract

Acoustic feedback is a common problem in hearing aids with vented earmolds. Hearing aids designed to work under normal conditions become unstable when the feedback path varies under changing conditions. A comprehensive study of the variability of the feedback path under various conditions and for different users is presented in this paper. A multiplicative uncertainty bound widely used in H-infinity robust control is suggested to model the variations, which is then used to formulate a robust stability condition for the hearing aid. The upper limit of the closed-loop acoustic gain of the hearing aid for maintaining robust stability is also derived. Examples of robust constant amplification hearing aids, which maintain stability in the face of the given variations in the feedback path, are presented. The robust stability condition is also suggested as a tool to design more robust digital, hearing aids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Rafaely, M Roccasalva-Firenze, E Payne. 2000. Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428652

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iontophoresis in vivo demonstrates a key role for GABA(A) and glycinergic inhibition in shaping frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of guinea pig.

The processing of biologically important sounds depends on the analysis of their frequency content by the cochlea and the CNS. GABAergic inhibition in the inferior colliculus shapes frequency response areas in echolocating bats, but a similar role in nonspecialized mammals has been questioned. We used the powerful combination of iontophoresis with detailed analysis of frequency response areas to test the hypothesis that GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition operating in the inferior colliculus of a nonspecialized mammal (guinea pig) shape the frequency responses of neurons in this nucleus. Our analysis reveals two groups of response areas in the inferior colliculus: V-shaped and non-V-shaped. The response as a function of level in neurons with V-shaped response areas can be either monotonic or nonmonotonic. Application of bicuculline or strychnine in these neurons, to block inhibition mediated by GABA(A) or glycinergic receptors, respectively, increases firing rate primarily within the boundaries of the control response area. In contrast, neurons in the non-V-shaped group have response areas that include narrow, closed, tilted, and double-peaked types. In this group, blockade of GABA(A) and glycine receptors increases firing rate but also changes response area shape, with most becoming more V-shaped. We conclude that (1) non-V-shaped response areas can be generated by GABA and glycinergic synapses within the inferior colliculus and do not simply reflect inhibition acting more peripherally in the pathway and (2) frequency-dependent inhibition is an important general feature of the mammalian inferior colliculus and not a specialization unique to echolocating bats.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers.

Current propositions of the quantity of sound driving the central auditory system, specifically around threshold, are diverse and at variance with one another. They include sound pressure, sound power, or intensity, which are proportional to the square of pressure, and energy, i.e., the integral of sound power over time. Here we show that the relevant sound quantity and the nature of the threshold can be obtained from the timing of the first spike of auditory-nerve (AN) fibers after the onset of a stimulus. We reason that the first spike is triggered when the stimulus reaches threshold and occurs with fixed delay thereafter. By probing cat AN fibers with characteristic frequency tones of different sound pressure levels and rise times, we show that the differences in relative timing of the first spike (including latencies >100 msec of fibers with low spontaneous rates) can be well accounted for by essentially linear integration of pressure over time. The inclusion of a constant pressure loss or gain to the integrator improves the fit of the model and also accounts for most of the variation of spontaneous rates across fibers. In addition, there are tight correlations among delay, threshold, and spontaneous rate. First-spike timing cannot be explained by models based on a fixed pressure threshold, a fixed power or intensity threshold, or an energy threshold. This suggests that AN fiber thresholds are best measured in units of pressure by time. Possible mechanisms of pressure integration by the inner hair cell-AN fiber complex are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

REM sleep enhancement due to rhythmical auditory stimulation in the rat.

From a physiological viewpoint, REM sleep (REMS) is a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are impaired. In the rat, REMS occurs in two forms respectively characterized by episodes separated by long intervals (single REMS episodes) and by episodes which have short intervals and occur in sequences (REMS clusters). Since the partition of REMS in the form of either single or clustered episodes may reveal how the REMS drive and body homeostatic processes interact in the control of REMS occurrence, we have used this approach to clarify the effects of the rhythmical delivery of an auditory stimulus (1000 Hz, 63 or 88 dB, 50 ms, every 20 s), which has been previously observed by different authors to enhance REMS in the absence of a previous sleep deprivation. Stimuli were delivered to pairs of animals and triggered by the occurrence of REMS in one rat (REMS-selective stimulation), whilst the other animal received the same stimulus irrespectively of the stage of the wake-sleep cycle (REMS-unselective stimulation). The results showed that the REMS-selective stimulation did not change the overall amount of REMS, since an increase in the occurrence of REMS clusters was concomitant with a decrease in the occurrence of single REMS episodes. In contrast, under the REMS-unselective stimulation, the total amount of REMS was increased during the second day of stimulation through an increase in the duration of both types of REMS episodes. Since during the REMS-unselective stimulation 87% of the stimuli fell outside REMS (i.e., during the REMS interval), the results show that the occurrence of REMS is more consistently affected when the stimuli are delivered in a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are fully operant.

Acoustic Stimulation↗